The Badger Herald

OPINION & EDITORIAL

When the moon shines

Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.

Also by Badger Herald Editorial Board:

A security fee-for-all (December 11, 2007)
Farewell, Chancellor (December 10, 2007)
$$FC (December 6, 2007)
In a bind (December 5, 2007)
Entitlement Town (December 4, 2007)

by Badger Herald Editorial Board

Thursday, January 27, 2005

As one of Madison’s most visible populations by day, the homeless face an astounding dilemma come night: where to sleep?

Local shelters don’t have enough beds to accommodate all those seeking warmth — especially during the chilly winter months. But the problem is exacerbated for those who seek a free bed with alcohol on their breath, as the city does not currently offer a shelter that welcomes the intoxicated.

Local activists have asked Mayor Dave Cieslewicz to allot some $300,000 for a “wet shelter.” Solid logic sits behind such a project, as not only would it serve to help a homeless community that loses members to freezing deaths every year, but it would also serve as a means of separating a volatile and potentially violent group of individuals from the mainstream population. To be sure, such a “wet shelter” would benefit many people with varying socioeconomic situations.

But questions abound about the viability and responsibility of such a project. What safeguards would exist to protect staff and inhabitants from dangers that lurk behind he bottle? Would persons be willing to patronize such a shelter if it meant that their liquor would be confiscated at the door and, if not, is the city prepared to supervise potentially reckless and dangerous activity in one of its own shelters?

The more pressing question, of course, is whether or not such a haven from the cold would send an inadvertent message to the homeless population that the city tolerates alcoholic habits. While Madison surely shouldn’t become so paternal as to advise panhandlers where they may and may not spend their money, the reality remains that over-consumption by the homeless can pose a public safety risk for pedestrians. The current lack of a “wet shelter” offers a certain deterrent from such behavior, but with the development of one, seemingly all incentives to move toward a dry lifestyle would be forfeited.

And above all else, the daunting price tag of such a project stands as a major obstacle to construction, especially with the city already forced to stretch means thin.

The hopeful solution to all of these problems would appear to lie within compromise. Mayor Cieslewicz should aggressively lobby various private charities and foundations to underwrite the development of a shelter that would doubtlessly save lives. The shelter itself should be constructed and run to provide warmth, without allowing the shadowy comforts of alcohol. Bottles cannot be allowed inside (nor can needles or any other paraphernalia) — it is one thing to accept a sad situation in status quo form, but it is altogether another to supervise its continuation. And realizing that alcoholism is for many a disease, rehabilitation options must be strenuously pitched to occupants at every available moment, possibly even with clinic shuttles being available at check out time in the morning.

After all, rehabilitation for many may not just be the ticket out of a wet shelter, but out of shelters altogether.

Feedback

Show all comments

Hide anonymous comments

Anonymous (January 27, 2005 @ 3:53pm):

"The more pressing question, of course, is whether or not such a haven from the cold would send an inadvertent message to the homeless population that the city tolerates alcoholic habits."

***

Every drunk homeless person in the USA will head for Madison. What's next, pubicly funded keggers for the homeless?

Anonymous (January 27, 2005 @ 4:51pm):

If you are concerned about issues regarding wet shelters and safety issues why not see one first hand?

Boston is home to one of the largest wet shelters in the US and you can travel there through the UW Alternative Spring Breaks program.

Come home from the trip with some real experience and then write an opinion article that has some base. Or, contact one of the over UW 100 students who have already participated in the trip.

Anonymous (January 27, 2005 @ 6:53pm):

Why don't we just send out written fucking invitations to every vagrant in the country?

Anonymous (January 27, 2005 @ 8:30pm):

"Why don't we just send out written fucking invitations to every vagrant in the country?"

Dude, have you seen Halloween on State Street? Isn't that what we've already done?

Anonymous (January 28, 2005 @ 5:55pm):

thehomelessguy.blogspot.com

If this loser put half the time into working as he does writing a whiny liberal blog, he'd have a home.

Homeless people choose to be homeless. Tough luck. When they want help they can get it. No need to encourage these losers.

Anonymous (January 28, 2005 @ 6:29pm):

"Homeless people choose to be homeless. Tough luck. When they want help they can get it. No need to encourage these losers."

Spoken like somebody who will will join the ranks of homeless losers in the not too distant future.