Opinion

Oops

Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.

Related stories:

• Oops! Britney indirectly helped trample the First Amendment again (September 11, 2001)
• Republican actions hurt student votes (November 3, 2005)
• Ten Commandments removal sparks counterpoint (September 10, 2003)
• Labels unnecessary, Katrina coverage lacking (September 8, 2005)
• Lessons in lecture hall etiquette (September 1, 2004)

Also by Badger Herald Editorial Board:

• The Invisible Man Award: Wyndham Manning (May 7, 2009)
• The People's Choice Award: Jacqueline Hitchon et. al (May 7, 2009)
• The Lifetime Achievement Award: ASM (May 7, 2009)
• Honest representation (May 5, 2009)
• Junger for ASM Chair (May 5, 2009)

Sharing tools:

E-mail this article:

Your e-mail address:

Recipient e-mail address:

Optional message:

Share on:

• Facebook
• Digg
• Newsvine
• reddit
• StumbleUpon
• delicious
• Google
• Yahoo! My Web
• BlogMarks
• Linkroll
• Simpy

• Spurl
• Connotea
• Fark
• Feed Me Links

• Magnolia
• BlinkList
• Sphere
• LinkedIn

• Furl
• Technorati
• AddToAny
• Permalink

Two weeks ago we endorsed Jeff Pertl for chair of United Council. While we disagree with him on many issues, we reasoned that a UW-Madison alumnus would be a welcome addition to an organization that has priorities frequently at odds with the unique needs of UW-Madison.

Of course, an even better alternative would be to withdraw from United Council and have ASM lobby state government directly. Unfortunately, the ASM powers-that-be just denied students the chance to choose this option, violating their own bylaws.

Part Five, Article Three, Section Two of ASM’s bylaws makes the question of continued UW-Madison representation in United Council a standing referendum. This referendum “shall be held in the spring of every even-numbered year and shall automatically be placed on the ballot by the [Student Election Commission] Chair.” As the 12.2 percent of students who voted in last week’s ASM elections know, this did not take place.

Unfortunately, this oversight by Student Judiciary (which oversees election) is no surprise — consider the other branches of student government. Student council has muddled through this last year without a purpose and has been silent on several major student issues, and SSFC doubled their portion of tuition; Student Judiciary probably felt left out of the incompetent club.

We know this was an honest mistake — the same thing happened in 2000. But if ASM wants to address the big issues on campus, they had best start by getting the little things right.