OPINION & EDITORIAL
ASM pay raises unacceptable
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Badger Herald Editorial Board:
- Madison's annual hip-hop conference falters (April 14, 2003)
- Dear Dave: Post this near your desk (April 17, 2003)
- Politicking destroyed opt-out's proponents (April 14, 2003)
- Don't Cut Historical Society Funds (April 29, 2003)
- Redirecting control (April 23, 2003)
Related Stories:
- Where do students rank? (November 12, 2001)
- Wiley's real stance (November 3, 2004)
- Enough said (November 15, 2001)
- Students still willing to pay their fair share, 18 percent is too much (March 10, 2003)
- GUTS gives tutorial (October 16, 2001)
by Badger Herald Editorial Board
Wednesday, November 7, 2001
We can now add basic math to the list of the Associated Students of Madison’s shortcomings.
Last Thursday, ASM proposed to raise its internal budget by 17 percent. Seven percent is due to a technicality, but the reason for the remaining 10 percent increase is a mystery.
ASM suggested it was merely keeping up with inflation. But what confuses us is that inflation last year averaged 4.4 percent — significantly less than the 10 percent ASM is asking for.
Moreover, ASM made significant cuts in several areas of its budget, including computers, copying, travel and publications.
Obviously, something was not adding up.
A close examination of the budget reveals the truth (as well as ASM’s reason to downplay it): They gave themselves raises.
If approved, next year the secretary of ASM will earn $2,000, 167 percent more than the $750 the position currently makes. Similarly, committee chairs will make 25 percent more, and student hourly positions will receive 55 percent more. Included among the student hourly positions are the narrowly defined diversity liaisons, who will see their pay skyrocket from $2,560 up to $3,950.
These pay raises, far in excess of inflation, are a flagrant abuse of student money. Not only have ASM’s visibility and activities decreased this year, but also seg fees — for which ASM is ultimately responsible — are spiraling out of control.
ASM can’t even make the argument that the raises will be used to reward returning staff members with high levels of expertise, since there is almost a complete turnover every year. And every year, ASM leadership says it’s underpaid, and claims that more money will improve student representation.
But, as this year’s less-than-stellar student leadership is proving, better pay does not necessarily result in better student government.
