OPINION & EDITORIAL
United Council overlooks representation for all
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Badger Herald Editorial Board:
- Madison's annual hip-hop conference falters (April 14, 2003)
- Dear Dave: Post this near your desk (April 17, 2003)
- Politicking destroyed opt-out's proponents (April 14, 2003)
- Don't Cut Historical Society Funds (April 29, 2003)
- Redirecting control (April 23, 2003)
Related Stories:
- Oops (April 17, 2002)
- RE: Fighting first-day jitters: Stevens Point not lame (September 10, 2001)
- ASM must trim the fat within (February 5, 2003)
- A bad bill (January 30, 2002)
- United Council: What $1.35 buys you (April 8, 2003)
by Badger Herald Editorial Board
Wednesday, October 24, 2001
Last weekend, United Council, the statewide coalition of student government, forbade the Student Government Association of UW-Stevens Point from casting one of its eight votes on the council because the Stevens Point delegation did not meet the UC’s “diversity credentials.”
These “diversity credentials” (a euphemism for the more accurate, though less legal term “quota”) are meant to ensure that the student governments that participate in UC give a voice to frequently underrepresented groups by requiring two women (one of which must be a woman of color), one student of color, one LGBT student, and one “traditionally underrepresented” student are part of each school’s delegation.
Assumedly, the quota system employed by UC is intended to encourage student council groups to fully represent the student bodies they advocate. The UC says its “diversity credential” system, which has been in place for 15 years, is intended to “ensure the spirit of shared governance is present within the United Council.”
But how can taking votes away from a delegation contribute to shared governance? Unfortunately, while UC is trying to give underrepresented students a voice, they are only ensuring hundreds of students lose theirs.
Moreover, quota systems like the one employed by UC have been rejected time and time again by courts and the public at both the state and national level.
But this quota system is wrong not just because the students of Stevens Point are denied a voice, or because it is illegal. Rather, its punitive nature serves to divide and differentiate students based on gender, race and sexual orientation. We agree diversity is essential, and it is important all groups have a voice, but such a rigid system heightens divisions without breaking down stereotypes and highlighting the concern we all share as students.
The purpose of diversity is to learn about and respect each other. We encourage UW-Stevens Point’s student government to increase its diversity, but we still care what they say.
Unfortunately, such a punitive law suggests UC doesn’t.
