News: UW System

Student Council debates internal budget changes

ASM representatives propose moving process from Finance Committee to Coordinating Council; may do away with check in system

Charlie Gorichanaz/The Badger Herald

Chair Matt Manes introduces SSFC

Charlie Gorichanaz/The Badger Herald

Vice chair Adam Johnson introduces ASM

Charlie Gorichanaz/The Badger Herald

Chair Brandon Williams introduces ASM

Student Council debates internal budget changes

Zhao Lim/The Badger Herald

The student government debated changing the process for how they determine their internal budget for the first time in 17 years on Wednesday.

The Associated Students of Madison’s Student Council spoke about the possible move of the internal budget process from the Finance Committee to the Coordinating Council at their meeting.

ASM Vice Chair Adam Johnson said the Finance Committee does not deal with ASM at large and has been responsible for drafting the budget for the past 17 years, since the conception of ASM.

Coordinating Council already sets goals for ASM and is much more aware of what happens throughout the entire organization, Johnson said.

“This will lead to a much better budget going forward,” Johnson added.

Finance Committee Chair Matt Beemsterboer said the Finance Committee does not know enough about ASM’s budget and the needs of all of its organizations in order to be responsible for drafting the budget.

Beemsterboer said in years past very few changes have been made to the budget by Finance Committee members because the committee has not been educated on and does not care about the budget.

SSFC Chair Matt Manes agreed the move of budget drafting would lead to more efficiency in developing it.

“It will be crafted by the people who actually understand it,” Manes said.

Representative Jolie Lizotte voiced concern about the potential move of budget drafting responsibility to council appointees, saying it contradicts how ASM runs its other committees.

Lizotte said having the budget drafted by the Finance Committee provides a check in the system and shifting the responsibility to Coordinating Council might eliminate that check.

Johnson explained Coordinating Council would only be responsible for drafting the basics of the budget.

He added after the budget is drafted, it still has to be scrutinized by SSFC and Student Council.

Manes said there is a difference between having input and having autonomy within a representative body.

“There are far and away enough checks in this system,” Manes said.

The Budget Reform Act will be further discussed at the council’s next meeting

In addition to discussing the Budget Reform Act, the council voted on Nominations Board Chair Andrea Nichols’ request for a leave of absence.

Nichols’ introduced a revised version of her request at the meeting.

Instead of the initial semester-long leave of absence she requested, Nichols’ reduced her leave to one month and will receive a 20 percent pay cut.

After one month, Nichols’ said she will either continue attending council meetings or resign.

It is not part of any chair’s responsibility to be at these meetings, Beemsterboer said.

Johnson said chairs should be required to attend council meetings, but he found the request to be reasonable.

The council approved the revised version of Nichols’ request.

The council also approved new judiciary appointments.

Nicholas Checker was appointed as an Associated Justice and Christopher Neal was appointed as the Student Judiciary Outreach Consultant.

ASM Chair Brandon Williams said both appointees are highly qualified and are expected to do well in their positions.

Have a thought? We welcome your input, but please be polite and stay on topic wherever possible. Your comment may be deleted if it is inappropriately off topic or promotional or if it is unnecessarily rude or contains personal attacks. We may delete comments for other reasons as well. Just keep it simple and focus on your points as respectfully as possible.

We allow and encourage comments employing satire, wit and irony to make points. Do not flag comments just because you disagree. Flagged comments will be immunized from further flagging unless they stray far from the guidelines and do not add to the discussion. Before flagging a comment you think is offensive, consider your time might be better spent rebutting it than censoring it.

blog comments powered by Disqus

1 older comment

user-pic

I think it would be a mistake for ASM to remove Finance Committee from the internal budget process. While it is not always apparent, the true role of finance committee is to manage ASM’s internal budget. Allocating event, travel and op grants are a component of that, but finance committee and the finance committee chair SHOULD be watching expenditures across ASM, working with ASM’s financial staff to identify areas where ASM over spent and underspent, auditing committees when necessary, and ensure that ASM appropriate manages its over $1,000,000 budget. I realize that this is a distant cry from what finance committee actually does, but it represents the potential for finance committee. They should be designing the budget annually because they should have the most intimate knowledge of how the budget process works.

Donate