People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and the Madison-based Alliance for Animals petitioned Tuesday to bring criminal animal cruelty charges against the University of Wisconsin for allegedly illegally performing decompression experiments on sheep.
The animal rights groups argued Wisconsin state law prohibits decompression experiments which result in an animal’s death. UW’s experiments place sheep in hyperbaric pressure chambers to simulate going underwater or a deep sea dive.
According to Eric Sandgren, director at UW’s Research Animal Resources Center, the university has conducted decompression experiments on sheep for many years following U.S. Navy funding. Researchers have gone on to develop treatment plans for divers in both military and job-related spheres based on the series of studies.
Sandgren added the statute in Wisconsin prohibits a method of euthanasia used in animal shelters, where decompression was simulated by withdrawing air from a room.
“The law is very general,” Sandgren said. “My read on it is that it would not include the kinds of studies we do.”
The Alliance for Animals argues the university’s experiments have broken a state statute, which in its entirety reads: “Decompression prohibited: No person may kill an animal by means of decompression.”
Sandgren added UW halted these decompression experiments involving sheep last summer after the Alliance’s claims of animal cruelty.
The petition comes after a campus debate Monday on the rights of non-human primate research. According to Alliance for Animals Director Rick Bogle, the two events align generally. Bogle says they both show UW’s recent violations in regard to cruelty against animals, adding UW should seriously look into its research policies.
Bogle added UW has an absolute responsibility to know and follow state laws in regard to cruelty against animals.
He also called the experiments a “blatant case of breaking the law,” and while the design of the experiments may not be illegal, the fact that sheep died is.
Bogle added the Alliance and PETA seek an order from Wisconsin courts to cease and desist, and also hope to fine the university for the sheep’s deaths and to discourage the university from breaking state law and hurting animals.
However, Sandgren says the UW has three ways to proceed: stopping the studies, specifying what exactly Wisconsin law refers to in terms of decompression and modifying experimental design.
“The experiments are not designed for animals to die,” Sandgren said. “So the studies themselves are not the problem. The fact that animals die is the problem.”
Sandgren added there are ways to change decompression experiments to help ensure animals will not die in the course of the study. For instance, remote monitoring of blood pressure and heart rate would give researchers more notice if an animal is having problems, and to help solve those problems.
“This is another step local activists are taking to try to stop this research and that’s their right,” Sandgren said. “Our responsibility is to try and move this research forward in a way that’s legal, because it is important.”


IP hash: b84c14f6
DA Brian Blanchard was absolutely right not to prosecute in this case. It is clear that the law was intended to cover decompression as a means on euthanasia, and I really doubt that the legislators who passed it ever considered what effect it might have on research into the bends. Rather than go through the expense of a trial it would be better to change the law.
PeTA and Bogle are just trawling through the legislation to see what laws they can apply to situations for which they were never originally intended, it’s pretty pathetic of them really.
UW are being very responsible in altering their procedures while this mess is cleared up, and I hope that won’t take too long. An amendment to the law granting an exemption for deaths that occur during research, but specifying that decompression cannot be used used as a means of enthanasia, should suffice.
IP hash: cbb475a1
Just think of all of the time and money wasted by PETA, Animal Alliance, and all of the fools that support them, that could have been ethically and compassionately used to help kids with severe diseases, cleft palates, and other physical deformities! It is the ultimate animal cruelty: Pissing money and effort away on such nonsense when so many humans are in desparate need here in Madison! Shame!!!!!
IP hash: cfcc5bcd
How is the money “wasted” when it’s trying to protect good causes, like helping animals? Depending on which side of the abortion debate you support, would you say the other side is “wasting” their time and money? There are thousands of causes that people lobby for—just because they don’t succeed doesn’t mean the money is “wasted.”
IP hash: f13f4493
Spending money on animals when children are in dire need is unethical. You lack the ethical and moral foundation to understand this, as do most of the animal “rights” crowd!
IP hash: 83efb8aa
Get off your high horse. There are so many problems in the world; I doubt you have done anything to fix any of them. PETA has the best intensions and is trying to make a difference for the animals that can’t speak for themselves. Stop being so selfish, they have every right to leave and be treated humanely.
IP hash: aa5208d1
According to The Capital Times, Martin Cadwallader may be charged with a crime over this. Could it be that someone is trying to get rid of him?