News: Top story
Gore: Climate reform still faces obstacles
Former vice president visits Madison, advocates agreement in Copenhagen to enforce lower emissions
LEAH BELLACK/Herald photo
Former Vice President Al Gore addresses a crowd Saturday, when he spoke on the past and future of the Earth’s environment.
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Jennifer Zettel:
- UW student in critical condition (February 2, 2010)
- Unemployment rises in state in December (January 28, 2010)
- International students excluded from RA unions (January 26, 2010)
- Two more H1N1 vaccination clinics to be held (January 22, 2010)
- Ticket prices may increase (January 21, 2010)
Former Vice President Al Gore gave the opening remarks at the Society of Environmental Journalists 19th Annual Conference at the Madison Concourse Hotel Friday, praising the progress that has been made in solving the climate crisis while also focusing on future progress.
Gore said two factors will significantly help overcome current obstructions to addressing the climate crisis in the United States. The first is the Senate’s climate change bill that supports significant reductions in the United State’s carbon dioxide emissions, while the second is an agreement at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which will take place in Copenhagen, Denmark from Dec. 7 to 18.
In regard to the bill, Gore felt members of both parties need to compromise and it is likely the legislation will pass before the conference.
“There is much more bipartisan dialogue underway behind the scenes in the United States Senate than is presently publicly visible,” he said.
To accomplish this, Gore said the time to advocate on behalf of climate and energy is now, since the Senate has finished health care deliberations.
Jim Rogers, audience member and chairman, president and CEO of Duke Energy Corporation, agreed having the bill pass in the Senate is ideal, but he said he felt the probability is decreasing every day.
“It would be a much higher probability of an agreement (at Copenhagen) … if the U.S. would [act] before Copenhagen, because we have to really lead on this issue in order to get a meaningful agreement,” Rogers said.
As far as reaching an agreement in Copenhagen, Gore said it would be unacceptable to leave without one, even if it were to be similar to the Montreal Protocol of 1987, which laid down mandatory deadlines for the phasing out of ozone-depleting chemicals.
Gore was optimistic a solution will be found for the current crises and pointed to the progress that has been made since President Barack Obama took office in January as evidence.
“[Obama] began to change the dialogue immediately upon taking office,” Gore said. “Few would have predicted that within the first six months the House of Representatives would pass major [carbon dioxide] reduction legislation.”
Jane Lubchenco, audience member, undersecretary of commerce for oceans and atmosphere and administrator at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, also felt the Obama administration has opened up doors that have previously been shut.
“This administration represents an opportunity … to make very meaningful changes,” she said.
The Obama administration introduced another key factor — the construction of a super-grid that will be able to transport large amounts of energy from their renewable sources, whether they are solar, wind or geothermal, Gore said.
Nancy Sutley, chair of the White House Council on Environmental Quality, said a long-term investment of a price on carbon would stimulate breakthroughs in emission reduction and solutions to the climate crisis.
As far as energy is concerned, Gore said he believed dependence on carbon-based fuels to be the common link between the climate, economic and national security crises in the U.S.
“One of the reasons why all three of these challenges have been difficult is that they have often been approached separately, but there is a common thread running through all three of them, and it is our over-dependence on carbon-based fuels,” he said. “If you grab that thread and pull it all three of these crises begin to unravel.
Another key area where progress is being made has been the number of people examining and believing the science involved with the climate crisis, according to Lobchenco.
“I think there is increasing recognition on the part of America and the rest of the world that climate change is what we need to address, so we’ve actually made significant progress — instead of denial, there is agreement that is real,” she said.
Despite this supposed widespread agreement, there was a large counter rally hosted cooperatively by Collegians for a Constructive Tomorrow and Americans for Prosperity. Well over 200 hundred people showed up to display their solidarity in opposing many of the ideas set forth by Gore, according to Christina Wilson, CFACT’s midwest director.
In addition to deriding the soundness of the science in Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth,” the counter-rally was particularly concerned with the cap-and-trade legislation Gore is pushing for. Wilson believes this legislation, if passed, would not only place cumbersome strain on America’s working families in a tanking economy by significantly increasing the cost of living, but would also severely hurt developing countries.
“The message is that there are real human consequences for what Al Gore is pushing for,” Wilson added.
Gore came under fire during the question-and-answer portion of his speech when Phelim McAleer, director of the film “Not Evil, Just Wrong,” stepped up to the microphone.
When asked about nine supposed errors in “An Inconvenient Truth,” Gore responded the British High Court ruled in favor of showing “An Inconvenient Truth” in schools, “and that’s really the bottom line.”
The two then got into a heated debate about whether polar bears are endangered. When Gore asked McAleer if he thought polar bears were endangered, McAleer’s only response was that their numbers had increased. McAleer’s microphone was then shut off and Gore moved on to the next question.
McAleer did attempt to receive an answer by continuing to push after his microphone was shut off, but to no avail.
“He hasn’t answered the question. … I would appreciate his answer,” McAleer said.
Overall, Gore was confident about the future, emphasizing methods to resolve the climate crisis are present.
“I believe we have all the tools we need to solve three or four climate crises, and the good news is we only have to solve one,” he said. “We have everything we need … with the possible exception of political will, but in the United States of America political will is a renewable resource.”
—Kyle Mianulli contributed to this article.
9 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Top Classified Ads (view all)
Place your classified ad online and have it show up here. Your ad will hit thousands of viewers a day!
DON'T READ ME! Too late. If you're reading this, guess how many other people are reading it. See... advertising in The Badger Herald does work!






IP hash: b80a4fbb
“When asked about nine supposed errors in “An Inconvenient Truth,” Gore responded the British High Court ruled in favor of showing “An Inconvenient Truth” in schools, “and that’s really the bottom line.””
The nine supposed errors were found by a court of law, yet the Badger Herald fails to mention that. The State Journal does so in its much better article:
http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/article_dacf39c7-c2f8-5718-a5a0-d0cfb39f80bc.html
Please provide the full context of the question in writing an article.
Oh, well. Time to go grab a coat before heading to campus. ;)
IP hash: 85ae2de9
Obstacles… like this damn cold weather!
IP hash: 9bba8b5d
Lock box.
IP hash: 91210598
The thing is that it been getting COLDER for 11 years, so it’s hard to get all worked up about the Goracle’s BS.
Global warming might be a problem, there might even be something we could do about it, but global cooling would definitely kill billions and end civilization as we know it.
PS. The ice age is overdue.
IP hash: e53275be
Where did this global warming issue get to be so politicized? I just spent a schaudenfreude-laden weekend pitting my scienceless liberal friends against my scienceless conservative friends over this very subject. Despite what Gore and the United Nations say, Global Warming is not yet a proven fact. I have seen in the eyes of my ‘progressive’ friends the same frightening light of zealotry that I have seen in a few of my more fundamentalist religious friends. Only when we throw off the ridiculous blinders of politics will we be able to sanely and responsibly address this potential problem.
IP hash: 3412785f
“As far as energy is concerned, Gore said he believed dependence on carbon-based fuels to be the common link between the climate, economic and national security crises in the U.S.”
The common link between these is a US government that doesn’t understand what its purpose is.
If our leaders understood that their job is to protect the rights freedoms of Americans then we’d have a foreign policy that protected Western oil discoveries and refused to allow them to fall into the hands of totalitarian regimes.
We’d also have a government the respected the rights of Americans to engage in economic activity without interference - bailouts, special favors, redistribution of wealth, etc.
IP hash: 30b4a19b
Gore is the biggest hippocrate when it comes to Global warming.He wants everybody to go green but himself.He has suv cars and private jets that have an enormous supposed carbon foot,all a bunch of garbage,plus he has an enormous house that wastes energy.If he beleives in what his COMMUNIST mouth says to the public he would get rid of these items and go green.He and his COMMUNIST cohorts will not do this,He is ha ha supposedly to good for this but the average joe will have his taxes raised because it will cost the average person another 3000 dollars a year,loose 3 to 4 million jobs and pay double to tiple gasoline price if this Cap and trade deal goes through.This will not help the supposed problem anyway.Humans are only responsible for about 2 percent of the supposed problem.Millons of years ago the North and South Poles were subtropic.In the middle ages there was a mild ice age.None of this was the Humans fault.Concerning this cap and trade garbage,China and India among the worst polluters will not join the group to lower the supposed carbon footprint.If GORE likes this so much why doesn’t the Govt.confiscate 95 percent of his estate in taxes to pay of the ripoff Cap and trade bill.
IP hash: 91210598
I just hope that the public wakes up before crap and tax REALLY tanks the economy!
Whatever happened to global warming? How freezing temperatures are starting to shatter climate change theory
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1220052/Austria-sees-earliest-snow-history-America-sees-lowest-temperatures-50-years-So-did-global-warming-go.html?ITO=1490#
IP hash: 8d70f487
what happened to free speech? Mary K Praete