News
UW-Whitewater coach reprimands reporters
Leipold overreacts to opinion column in The Royal Purple
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Kyra Shishko:
- ASM unable to pick chair (May 3, 2009)
- UW to look at Mexico trips (April 29, 2009)
- UW-Whitewater coach reprimands reporters (April 24, 2009)
- UW outreach attracts adults (April 17, 2009)
- Petition against UWSP student government (April 10, 2009)
Sharing tools:
E-mail this article:
University of Wisconsin-Whitewater football coach Lance Leipold met with students and administrators Thursday to discuss his controversial response earlier this week to an editorial published in the student newspaper that condemned the behavior of three student athletes.
When UW-Whitewater student Michael Daly published his editorial in The Royal Purple, UW-Whitewater’s student newspaper, he said he had no idea the response it would generate.
According to Daly, he had been working out at the weight room on campus one evening when three UW-Whitewater athletes, who are not allowed to work out without a fitness coach, came into the room. At first, they all refused to show their student IDs, resulting in the involvement of campus employees and eventually the police.
Daly said he felt this was another instance of privileged athletes trying to take advantage of university facilities due to their status as student athletes and decided to write the article.
“My original plan was to do a news article, but when the athletes wouldn’t talk, I had to turn it into a column,” Daly said. “I didn’t use names. I only used an example. I guess someone showed Leipold the column, and that’s what set him off.”
Leipold contacted the paper soon after.
“He first called the sports editor — I don’t know why, he had nothing to do with it — and he demanded a meeting with me, the sports editor and our adviser. He was upset and using profane language. Then he called again when our sports editor was in a night class, and he was just livid,” Daly said.
Leipold threatened to ban press coverage of the football team, saying The Royal Purple would no longer be allowed to attend games or interview him or the players, Daly added.
Paul Plinske, the athletic director at UW-Whitewater, does not agree with Leipold’s behavior but thinks that Leipold’s actions were out of defense for his team.
“I think his behavior was completely unacceptable,” Plinske said. “However, Lance (Leipold) is an exceptional coach and he was particularly concerned about holding our athletes to a higher level of behavior. He just felt that The Royal Purple inaccurately depicted our student athletes.”
Daly was pleased, however, that Leipold is taking full responsibility for his statements.
“They are not denying that it happened; they admit it happened [and] the reason they’re upset is that he doesn’t think that it was accurately portrayed. He tried to say he did discipline [the athletes and] that it wasn’t public,” Plinske said.
At this point, the university has publicly reprimanded Leipold and will follow up with the personnel matter when he returns to campus, Plinske added.
According to Plinske, the situation was only a minor event that became something much more.
“We are extremely disappointed that this situation occurred, and we’re hopeful that this will bring us closer together and help us to have better success working with our students,” Plinske said.
Leipold declined to comment to The Badger Herald Thursday.
3 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Brother Ali makes an ‘Exclusive’ stop
Muckrakers
Report: Barrett to make decision by the end of the week
Extra Points
Top Classified Ads (view all)
HOUSES FOR Fall 2010. All houses are on W Dayton or N Bassett. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 bedrooms. All have parking. madisoncampusrentals.com
Did the writer of the column visit with the coach first? Apparently not. Did the writer of the column perform due diligence in researching the story/column before publication? Apparently not. Did the writer publish the story/column with no bias or pre-determined purpose? Apparently not. It appears to me that the writer was only trying to elevate himself by seeing his name on a byline, and now hearing his name associated with a story that casts doubt on a proud program with a proven coach who was willing to sacrifice his professional standing to defend his players in what has turned into a print witch hunt. Ask yourself, Mr. Daly… if you have a bad paper or test in a class, are your grades published and subject to public ridicule? If you ‘go off’ on a part-time employee at a fast food restaurant, are you going to be singled out in a headline that suddenly becomes regional or national news? This is part of the responsibility that all journalists need to embrace and understand. Do you? Apparently not.
Royal Purple was the color of Lance Leipold’s face after he embarrassed himself, his players, and UW-Whitewater by acting like a complete jerk because of an article in the school newspaper. What a clown Leipold is.
9:16 - you obviously do not understand privacy law.
“if you have a bad paper or test in a class, are your grades published and subject to public ridicule?” No, because this is information regarding which a person would have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
“If you ‘go off’ on a part-time employee at a fast food restaurant, are you going to be singled out in a headline that suddenly becomes regional or national news?” Potentially, yes. Anyone who happened to be in the fast food restaurant at the same time would have seen your inappropriate behavior, so you have no reasonable expectation of privacy in that situation. It would not be out of line for a reporter to publish your picture along with the story, and your name if he could legally obtain it. Since the incident in the UW-Whitewater situation took place in a public weight room which, I assume, was available to any student at the college, any student could have witnessed the behavior that was the subject of the article. Therefore, the players have no reasonable expectation of privacy and it was perfectly acceptable to publish this story. The coach was simply overreacting with no legal basis.