News
Election ‘08: Political professors
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Ken Harris:
- BREAKING: Board approves second-trimester abortions (February 4, 2009)
- Officials finish marching band investigations (December 2, 2008)
- After being kicked out of office for smoking, disabled professor struggles to work (November 20, 2008)
- Roundy's backs out, leaves U-Square in need of grocer (November 13, 2008)
Sharing tools:
E-mail this article:
University of Wisconsin System staff and faculty are donating hundreds of thousands of dollars to candidates’ campaigns in both state and federal elections, lending financial support to Democrats over Republicans by a substantial margin.
The disparity, a ratio of more than 55-to-1 in federal elections, causes some to doubt UW’s ability to foster political diversity on campus.
Instead of providing an environment that promotes unbiased political discussions that enhance learning, some worry certain UW faculty members use the classroom to push a liberal agenda.
According to the Center for Responsive Politics, a website that posts contributions for all federal campaigns, UW faculty and staff contributed $312,168 as of Oct. 28 toward the 2008 election cycle.
Of that money, $296,416 has gone to Democratic candidates or organizations, and only $5,377 has been donated to Republicans. Third parties and special interest groups have received the remaining $10,375.
Campus partisanship concerns
Mike McCabe, executive director of Wisconsin Democracy Campaign, whose website contains a searchable database of statewide campaign contributions, said the disparity has a lot to do with “the deteriorating relationship with the Legislature and the university.”
Critical views of UW, like those of Rep. Steve Nass, R-Whitewater, are “pretty representative” of views held by many of the state Assembly Republicans, who are currently in the majority, McCabe said.
Nass has often been critical of UW, believing it has a liberal political agenda.
At the same time, critical opinions expressed by former UW Chancellor John Wiley in a Madison Magazine column — blaming a combatively partisan political environment at the state government level for slowing the state’s progress — are fairly mainstream among UW System faculty, McCabe said.
“There’s a lot of people who feel that the relationship has soured,” McCabe said, adding he has spoken at many campuses and has spoken to many university classrooms at the request of professors.
McCabe said when he started his career as a legislative aide in 1981, it was common for legislators to call on UW professors to help with policies and even to draft legislation.
He added the pipeline that used to run between the Capitol and university no longer exists, adding the donating patterns of UW employees at the state level reflect their disapproval with the Republican-run Assembly.
“There’s been this thing called the Wisconsin Idea — the idea that the boundaries of the university are the boundaries of the state,” McCabe said. “The Wisconsin Idea has fallen on hard times.”
According to Mike Mikalsen, spokesperson for Nass, the disproportionate number of Democrats in the UW System — and at UW in particular — creates an environment that stifles conservative thought.
“What is concerning to Nass is in many cases, you have people of conservative views who are fearful of expressing those views for fear of retribution,” Mikalsen said.
Mikalsen said because UW is currently run by Democrats, an “encouragement of balance” is lacking.
Mikalsen added he and Nass have received complaints from students and even faculty who are afraid to participate publicly with Republicans for fear of being unfairly graded, socially censured or even losing their jobs. He added the people who have come forward have asked for confidentiality to protect themselves.
The administration needs to make an effort “from top to bottom” to promote political diversity, according to Mikalsen, who added, “they talk a good game when it comes to the exchange of ideas,” though they do not back it up.
“In the UW System, the one area there is not a good effort is to promote diversity,” Mikalsen said. “With Chancellor Wiley, there was a lack of effort on his part for keeping politics out of the classroom.”
UW political science professor Donald Downs, who has contributed to the Republican presidential candidate John McCain’s campaign, said while ideological balance on the UW campus needs to be improved, there is not an administrative effort to stifle free thinking.
“There’s a definite lack of intellectual diversity on campus, and that’s definitely a problem,” Downs said. “Students need to be exposed to all relevant viewpoints.”
Downs said the university’s leadership fails in promoting balance by not being more vocal in advocating political diversity, adding they are promoting a liberal agenda “by default” by not making it a priority.
UW will “just maintain the status quo” if it does not make more of an effort to raise awareness of the problem, he added.
However, Downs said he has not experienced any fear of retribution from the administration for voicing conservative viewpoints.
He said when he worked for UW history professor John Sharpless in his bid for Congress as a Republican in 2000 against Rep. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., he actually received encouragement within his department.
Downs added he believes the fear of conservatives to speak out publicly is due more to being a minority than to being systematically oppressed.
“It has to do with feeling like a Martian on Earth rather than an Earthling, and that’s more of a social thing,” Downs said.
UW has actually improved in its acceptance of conservative views with the Faculty Senate, abolishing the faculty speech codes in 1999, he added.
The codes, enacted in 1989 under then-Chancellor Donna Shalala, were often used to stifle conservative thoughts by professors, though they were meant to prevent legitimate harassment.
While Mikalsen says the UW administration does not get involved enough to stop the political harassment that can occur on campus and in classrooms, UW Provost Pat Farrell said UW takes “the notion that students aren’t free to voice their opinion very seriously.”
He said allegations of political bias in the classroom are not ignored by UW administrators. However, the issues are handled at the departmental level because individual departments are better equipped to get results.
Farrell dismissed the idea that professors would be afraid to advocate for conservatives for fear of losing their jobs or not getting tenure as untrue.
“Nothing like that could ever happen,” Farrell said. “We’re in the bounds of fantasy when we start talking about that.”
Bias in the classroom
The UW Offices of the Dean of Students defines bias as “an intentional threat or act of harassment or intimidation” directed toward a student because of a certain characteristic he or she possesses.
In the case of political bias, that characteristic in play would be the student’s political views.
Farrell said while sometimes during political discussions, faculty members’ personal opinions are revealed, their intent is not to convince anyone they are right but to engage their students in serious conversation.
He added UW does not allow campaigning in the classroom and said students who are really concerned should take the appropriate avenues instead of speaking anonymously to Nass or Mikalsen.
According to Farrell, there is a real risk of professors who are afraid of allegations of bias censoring themselves and failing to appropriately stimulate students.
He added it is the role of professors to challenge their students.
“That’s part of what universities are about,” Farrell said. “That’s where a lot of great learning occurs.”
The notion of challenging ideas, however, is uncomfortable to some, Farrell said, adding, “They use that notion of bias to hide behind.”
UW political science professor Scott Straus has dealt with false allegations of political bias in his classroom that he was cleared of by the College of Letters and Science administration.
He said despite the incident, he does not feel his academic freedom is in jeopardy after a departmental discussion led to a consensus among political science faculty that neutrality was important.
“Universities don’t want to get in the business of dictating what professors can say in their classrooms,” Straus said, adding that path can be a slippery slope to suppression.
He added he is in the “business of teaching ideas and analysis” and believes professors should take a nonpartisan viewpoint while teaching.
Downs also said the fear of offending students is not productive for the exchange of ideas crucial to learning, adding, “The last thing you want is for people to be afraid to offend liberals or conservatives.”
12 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Top Classified Ads (view all)
HOUSES FOR Fall 2010. All houses are on W Dayton or N Bassett. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 bedrooms. All have parking. madisoncampusrentals.com
No, no you don’t understand! My political views have nothing to do with what I teach the students! I maintain a level of intellectual neutrality in the classroom!!!
gets UC-Berkeley PhD in women’s studies writes thesis on evilness of white patriarchal AmeriKKKa accepts UW-Madison associate prof gig profits
University professor = educated = liberal
9:07—
I’m a PhD candidate here at the UW, and quite conservative. Your logic defies logic.
Apparently, republicans would like to be designated as an under represented minority
uneducated = moron = conservative
After 8 years of Bush, it’s hard not to want someone from another party to take the reins.
“According to Mike Mikalsen, spokesperson for Nass, the disproportionate number of Democrats in the UW System — and at UW in particular — creates an environment that stifles conservative thought.”
Stifles conservative thought? I didn’t realize there was critical thinking being done…
University professor = never had a real job = liberal
PUHLEASE! When the good liberal professors at UW-Madtown post their politcal persuasions on their office doors, such as gun control or abortion advocacy stickers, their political affiliations are unambiguously displayed.
They don’t do it to ‘provoke thoughtful discussion’. It is an ‘in your face’ statement and woe to the student that challenges them. Clearly it is a Liberal dose of intimidation by those in power squarely aimed at their conservative underlings who strive for a decent GPA and must remain silent because of ‘a certain characteristic that he or she possesses’. And if you believe down-grading by Liberal profs for conservative dissent by a student doesn’t occur, you are not being honest.
Donna Shalala was one of the worst practitioners of Liberal bigotry on the UW campus. Abolishing her speech codes at best removed only the bandaids over the bullet holes. The ugly wounds riven by Liberal bias are still there and the internal bleeding of the student body politic continues yet today. The bias is so palpable within certain departments that it seems more closely akin to the segregation and Jim Crow laws of decades past. Of course, the racists didn’t see a problem with it back then…. and the Liberals don’t see a problem with it now.
My, how the past is prelude!
The much larger problem at UW-Madison is the grade fraud scandal in the Department of Political Science. Why does Downs not mention this? The scandal is well know in the legislature.
NY Times article about a study that concluded political opinions are not changed by professors:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/03/books/03infl.html
So let me see if I understand. You go to college to get smarter. Along the way, you get so smart you actually have opinions and a really good understanding of what would and would not work in the world of politics. Then you get accused of having a liberal bias because you’re so smart? Maybe the Wisconsin Legislative Republicans should look harder at their intellectual deficits instead of whining about everyone else. Clearly, this nation, and this State, have had enough of GOP game playing. This is just one more game in their arsenal.