Quantcast

NEWS

Sunshine and Pesticides

Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.

Also by Allie Tempus:
Related Stories:
Share This:
by Allie Tempus
Tuesday, May 6, 2008

Temperatures are warming up, and the last of the snow has finally melted, leaving behind the University of Wisconsin’s all-too-inviting grassy expanses. Grateful students are hitting Bascom Hill and other campus green spaces in droves.

What they might not know is that every year, the UW Physical Plant treats campus lawns with powerful herbicides scientifically linked to serious health risks — to which many students are exposed.

UW alumnus Clove Lilienthal knows the danger all too well, she says. Diagnosed with multiple sclerosis in 1991, Lilienthal believes the severity of her condition is in part due to cumulative exposure to lawn care chemicals.

Now bound to a wheelchair, with only partial use of one hand, Lilienthal motioned to a small picture frame on the opposite wall of her living room during a recent interview.

“I used to be a dancer. That was me,” she said matter-of-factly, adding she graduated from UW in 1979 with a degree in dance therapy.

The young woman in the photograph strikes a dramatic pose, an image of flexibility and strength.  Lilienthal returned to UW to earn her master’s degree in dance and women’s studies, but was unable to complete her studies because of her illness, she said.

Lilienthal has since co-founded the Greater Madison Healthy Lawn Team with family physician Claire Gervais. The group’s formation was triggered by Lilienthal’s concern over her neighbors’ use of chemical lawn treatments.

A cause for concern

The Healthy Lawn Team’s mission to reduce pesticide use in the Madison area is now being echoed by a small group of passionate UW students hoping to make campus pesticide-free.

UW senior Melissa Greulich and sophomores Cordelia Cmiel and Jenna Rasmusson, working side by side with professors, have extensively researched the use of pesticides on campus and their potential health risks. The three students are currently circulating a petition to make the campus pesticide-free.

While Rasmusson began her research as an independent study project for a biology class, Greulich and Cmiel pursued their interest in pesticide use as interns for the UW chapter of the Wisconsin Student Public Interest Research Group.

Warren Porter, a professor in the UW zoology department with more than 20 years of work in molecular and environmental toxicology with a focus on child development, has been aiding the students’ research.

“I do know of many students of mine who have been exposed to pesticides in other situations and have become ill permanently as a consequence of that exposure,” Porter said, adding these illnesses have ranged from immune disorders to different types of cancer.

Porter said chemical pesticides are also likely to blame for steady increases in adverse effects on the learning abilities, immune systems and aggression levels in children.

“This planet cannot afford to raise a generation of children that are learning-disabled and hyper-aggressive,” Porter said. “And yet that is what we’re moving toward.”

Greulich said even for these risks alone, pursuing a pesticide-free environment is the responsible thing to do.

“These chemicals are so small that we don’t know if we’re getting them in our bodies but they are really easily absorbed through your skin, inhaled or ingested on foods that they’re sprayed on,” Greulich said. “They’re really everywhere in our environment, and we need to stop using them now, so in 10 years we don’t have these really bad effects on future generations.”

“It’s an issue that directly pertains to human health,” Rasmusson added. “So instead of being an environmental issue, which many people won’t be as interested in or as actively concerned about, it’s a direct health issue.”

Battle for Bascom Hill

The UW Board of Regents website on pesticide use lists totals of pesticides and fertilizers used on campus for every year since 1997, with the number of pounds and gallons of each product applied.

According to Gene Turk, the buildings and grounds superintendent for environmental services with the Grounds Management Department of UW’s Physical Plant, the university hires the private business TruGreen (formerly TruGreen ChemLawn) to spray a broadleaf herbicide called Tri-power one time in the fall of every year.

“They come in, and they get it done within probably two hours. That’s why we hire them, because they can get it in and get it done (faster than the grounds department),” Turk said, adding the application is generally done on Saturdays and signs are posted to warn the public.

The online campus pesticide data indicates 36 gallons of Tri-power were applied to campus grounds in 2007.

“It’s basically (applied in) areas that we think are maybe a higher priority than some areas or areas that maybe the turf would struggle if we didn’t take the broadleafs (weeds) out of it,” Turk said.

He said these areas include Bascom Hill, the Agriculture Hall lawns and green spaces along University Avenue.

Porter pointed out this policy targets many areas where students frequently sit.

“We’re needlessly exposing students in some cases to these pesticides that can alter their health,” he said.

The toxicological report for Tri-power, which contains the chemicals dicamba, mecoprop and MCPA, states that repeated overexposure may affect the “liver, kidneys, blood chemistry and gross motor functions.” The report also states that “the product contains substances that are considered to be probable or suspected human carcinogens.”

Through research for her independent study, Rasmusson found that TruGreen fertilizer, applied to campus last year in the thousands of pounds, is manufactured by Riverdale, the same company that manufactures Tri-power.

“The active ingredients in TruGreen (fertilizer) are the same as in Tri-power, but they’re a lot less concentrated,” Rasmusson said.

In addition to Tri-power, the grounds department applied other substances in 2007, including a gallon of Arbotect injected into campus elm trees, most of which are on Bascom Hill. The table also indicates that more than 50 gallons of Phyton, a bactericide and fungicide toxic to fish, were applied to campus grounds.

Also in 2007, nearly 80 gallons total of the herbicide Round-Up were applied to shrub beds on campus and in the Lakeshore Nature Preserve. According to the Healthy Lawn Team’s website, ingredients such as glyphosate in Round-Up are also highly toxic to fish and have been linked to spontaneous abortion in humans.

Around five years ago, Porter gave a presentation of his research to the grounds management department, according to Porter.

“I tried to show them that there are challenges to the university, because if students got ill as a result of exposures to these lawn chemicals, the university would be liable,” Porter said. “So what they did instead (of stopping pesticide use) was to hire an outside lawn company to do the spraying instead so that the lawn company would assume the liability if any claims were made.”

In addition, Porter said he suggested alternatives such as organic fertilizers and referred grounds management to the Healthy Lawn Team.

Turk said the grounds department didn’t put these alternatives into effect because they were impractical for an institution as large as UW.

“Those kinds of situations might work good at somebody’s home, but not on a campus,” he said.

UW zoology and limnology professor Stanley Dodson said alternatives could be practical given the right expectations.

“If your goal is the perfect golf course lawn, then that’s probably not true,” he said. “But if you want to have what I call a ‘professor lawn,’ with your dandelions here and there, some moss maybe on the edge, various plants in it, then [alternative fertilizers could be used] no problem.”

Dodson, who has researched storm water retention ponds in Dane County, found lawn chemicals can also have adverse effects on the bodies of water.

“If the watershed (area that drains into the water) is more than 25 to 30 percent lawn, then there won’t be aquatic vegetations, amphibians, snails, and things (like plankton) will be reduced, and fish growth is also reduced,” Dodson said, adding that he is now involved with a larger scale study that examines lakes.

Although he has no conclusive evidence, Dodson said it is possible Lake Mendota has been affected by pesticides used on campus.

Turk is positive the application of Tri-power by TruGreen poses no danger of chemical runoff into area waterways, since the application of the pesticides is well-monitored.

“They are instructed to stay a certain distance away from all the waterways,” Turk said. “We map it out with them every year, we meet with them, they go out with a grounds supervisor on site with them. … It’s not that we just say, ‘Here’s some money, go do what you want.’”

A university of diversity?

Turk said pesticides are used on campus for cosmetic reasons and to eliminate plants that compete with grass.

Dodson recommended different criteria for appraising campus green space.

“A pure green, uniform lawn is a sick lawn,” he said. “It’s not good for the water, it’s not good for the people, it’s not good for dogs that run on it, because the only way you can produce a pure green lawn is by using a lot of pesticides.”

Instead, Dodson explained that we should be aiming for different types of plants coexisting in the same green space.

Although the initiative to go pesticide-free just began this semester, some of the student body has taken notice.

Tyler Schappe, a UW freshman also relaxing on Bascom Hill last week, said he can see where the university is coming from.

“I understand that it’s to maintain the look of the University because they are trying to draw visual appeal,” Schappe said, adding he still doesn’t like the idea of pesticides on campus grounds. “I really had no idea,” he said.

Lilienthal thinks that though the trend of the uniform “golf course” certainly extends to large institutions like UW, it is an idea that has evolved in residential areas.

“There’s people that hate dandelions, and it’s just kind of a mindset that has grown up with suburban America,” Lilienthal said. “My lawn is green. … There’s all kinds of stuff growing in my lawn, but it’s green.”

‘Grassroots’ organizing: Finding a (pesticide-free) solution

Although Turk was unaware of the petition to make campus pesticide-free, the knowledge doesn’t worry him.

“These things come and go, as do students,” Turk said. “As with anything, there’s always somebody who may not necessarily agree with the approach that we’re using,”

Greulich, Cmiel and Rasmusson have gathered a total of nearly 200 signatures at two events thus far. They plan to continue recruiting people to support their cause when they officially propose the pesticide-free initiative to the University.

Student reactions to the initiative, Greulich and Cmiel said, have ranged from excitement to hesitation.

“It’s really important that we do a petition like this because, since it’s not something everyone talks about, the university wouldn’t necessarily know that students actually cared,” Cmiel said.

But after all the facts are laid on the table, the question remains: If pesticides pose serious health risks, why is there resistance to switch to alternatives?

Porter attributed it to habit.

“People are used to doing things one way, and sometimes it takes them awhile to decide to do something differently,” he said.

TruGreen does offer a natural, pesticide-free fertilizer option generally effective at inhibiting dandelion growth, but according to Lilienthal, it may not yield results on par with chemicals.

“It might be more work, so that might be discouraging for people who just want a chemical company to come out five times a year and give a little spray,” Lilienthal said.

But more work, even initially, may be too much for an institution the size of UW to handle, Turk says.

“If somebody has a treatment that would do the same thing as the herbicide does and does it in a timely fashion, then we certainly would consider it,” Turk said. “We don’t have the manpower to do these kinds of things, and that’s why we hire TruGreen.”

“You can do something as simple as vinegar and water and lemon juice to kill a dandelion, and that doesn’t hurt anyone,” Greulich said. 


Anonymous (May 6, 2008 @ 6:57am):

'UW alumnus Clove Lilienthal knows the danger all too well, she says.'

A female graduate of UW would be known as an alumna.

Anonymous (May 6, 2008 @ 7:03am):

Keep up the good fight, guys. The grounds crew doesn't take you seriously because they know you'll be gone in four years (ask Porter about this, he mentioned it in a lecture of his on this issue). Please use your leverage through WISPIRG to get the word out on this and inform students!

Anonymous (May 6, 2008 @ 8:46am):

Nice job Allie! First article this year that seemed relevant and not directly copied from the AP.

Anonymous (May 6, 2008 @ 11:03am):

This article is not based on facts and is almost ridiculas in its accusations of the dangers involved. Many household cleaning products are far more toxic as are alcoholic beverages and cigarettes.

Anonymous (May 6, 2008 @ 3:25pm):

So, are HERBicides or PESTicides (or both) the problem? Don't use these words interchangeably, it confuses people and makes you sound stupid. HERBicides kill plants, and PESTicides kill animals. They are not the same thing.

Anonymous (May 6, 2008 @ 4:06pm):

Actually, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, herbicides fall under the larger umbrella of pesticides because they address some kind of "pest" or nuisance.

Educate yourself:
http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/about/types.htm#type

Anonymous (May 6, 2008 @ 4:47pm):

Actually, herbicides are a type of pesticide (that kill plants). Pesticide is the general name for chemicals that kill plants, fungi, animals, etc.

Anonymous (May 6, 2008 @ 6:31pm):

HERBicides AND PESTicides are both very threatening problems. Yes, they are different, but they cause similar affects.

Anonymous (May 6, 2008 @ 6:41pm):

To 11:03:
The difference is that we have a choice to use household cleaning products, smoke cigarettes, and drink alcohol. Spraying herbicides on a public lawn is exposing students without their consent or knowledge

Robyn Shingler (May 6, 2008 @ 6:59pm):

pes·ti·cide –noun a chemical preparation for destroying plant, fungal, or animal pests.

Find this and other college level words on websters.com

Now, who 'sounds stupid'?

Anonymous (May 6, 2008 @ 10:53pm):

Whoever said this article is not based in fact obviously missed the fact that four people actually did research on these pesticides all semester long. Ask Warren Porter, and he could point you to many scientific studies proving exactly what this article states-pesticides are correlated to serious health issues. (an its ridiculous, not ridiculas.) maybe you should do some research before you make accusations.

Anonymous (May 7, 2008 @ 2:51am):

yes yes, pesticides are bad for us. just like the sun, diet soda, and i can't remember what else. this is being blown a little out of proportion, wouldn't you say? i mean-- should i fear the grass? are people really going to stop laying on it? is the lack of details of the symptoms and exposure levels of these "permanent illnesses" merely coincidental? we already have the tv-media warning us that everything is "bad"... this article sounds as baseless as the argument against GMOs or phenylalanine. if it truly isn't, so be it, but that's how you've made your case.

Anonymous (May 7, 2008 @ 11:20am):

This article is not urging people to not lay on the grass, not to change their enjoyment of the sun and Bascom hill. It's informing people that there are serious health and environmental implications of the chemicals used to keep the grass looking unnaturally 'perfect'. I think this article is asking us to reconsider our vision of the perfect lawn, and ask ourselves if the risk of using chemicals is worth it.
So while the majority of us won't become ill from hanging out on Bascom (or at least we won't be able to directly link our illnesses to these chemicals), and some fish in lake mendota will continue to exist, as students paying to study on this campus we should be able to decide the conditions in which we live.

Anonymous (May 7, 2008 @ 1:36pm):

Some facts missing from this article:
- Nobody knows what causes MS - it certainly hasn't been directly tied to MS use.
- Most herbicide residue dissipates in a very short period.
- Any professor from the ag department would rail against the claims in this article
- "Repeated exposure," means direct contact with pesticides, not sitting on a lawn that was sprayed yesterday (pesticides are gone by then).

A perfect example of slanted, unbalanced propaganda.

Anonymous (May 7, 2008 @ 7:42pm):

Some missing facts from your argument:

-Pesticides persist in the environment for long periods of time. The combination of pesticides on campus (Tri-power) can persist from 1-7.5 weeks. And even after they are gone from the grass they can leach into bodies of water surrounding campus...considering we have 3 lakes on our campus this could be a problem. Also, once we absorb, ingest, or inhale these chemicals they stay in our bodies for years! Although we would all like to believe these chemicals disappear, it is not that simple.
-Is this a fact that anyone from the Ag department would rail against these arguments? How can you vouch for this many people? I know one professor in the department that is completely against the use of pesticides.
-The article NEVER says MS is solely caused by pesticides. Perhaps these potent chemicals have the ability to induce MS. How do you know these things are not linked?
-How is sitting on a lawn sprayed with pesticides not direct contact? Indirect contact would be absorbing, inhaling, or ingesting them through another source where they were not directly applied to.

Exposure to pesticides is not a choice made by everyday people -It is INVOLUNTARY. Drinking soda, smoking and drinking alcohol are all decisions that are made by individuals. Why do you think smoking was banned from most bars and restaurants? Because exposure to secondhand smoke is detrimental to one's health and is INVOLUNTARY!

Anonymous (May 8, 2008 @ 8:43am):

Gosh! Wouldn't the world be a better place if we could just eliminate all pesticide use tomorrow? Of course, the world would be filled with pestilence, disease and we would all starve -- but it would be in a healthy way.

“A pure green, uniform lawn is a sick lawn†- Yeah, healthy chlorophyl production is a sign of plant sickness.

Anonymous (May 8, 2008 @ 12:40pm):

Thing is, there are things called 're-entry periods' and 'pre-harvest periods' that tell us how long it should be before we enter a field or eat a crop. So even if bascom hill is sprayed every year, the product may very well have broken down by now.

the issue this article fails to address is the actual toxic risk to animals/people that are sitting on the grass are exposed to. THAT is the question that I would like answered before this article gets everyone all riled up.

It would be silly to say that if someone sprayed yesterday that 'the pesticides would be gone by today.' that is a VERY false statement. but there are rules in place stating when it is safe to get back into a field (or on to bascom) after pesticides have been applied

Add a comment

We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.

Login...



   Remember me


Not registered? Sign up now.

It's quick, free, and the email address you provide will not be sold or solicited.

...or Post Your Comment Anonymously

Anonymous

Find bars and restaurants! Place a shout-out!
Top Classified Ads (view all)

Place your classified ad online and have it show up here. Your ad will hit thousands of viewers a day!

DON'T READ ME! Too late. If you're reading this, guess how many other people are reading it. See... advertising in The Badger Herald does work!

Place a classified ad

Advertising