NEWS
Coal plant encouraging residents to speak up
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Ken Harris:
- Miller pleads insanity at arraignment (February 19, 2008)
- Ph.D.s start up online tutoring business (February 18, 2008)
- ‘Kumar’ joins ‘Superman’ at Laundry 101 rally (February 15, 2008)
- University makes presidential honor (February 14, 2008)
- Madison alumni to be mailed around the world (February 14, 2008)
Related Stories:
- Students blast UW coal plant (November 16, 2006)
- Sierra Club sues over coal plant (May 4, 2007)
- Coal plant faces stiff opposition (November 15, 2006)
- Wiley faces coal for Christmas (November 29, 2006)
- Plant must cut coal usage (November 27, 2007)
by Ken Harris
Wednesday, February 20, 2008
Responding to a United States District Court ruling last November, the University of Wisconsin and the state Department of Administration are holding a town hall meeting Thursday to hear community opinions regarding the future of the Charter Street coal plant and others in the city.
The meeting will be held in room G-09 of the State Office Building at 101 S. Webster St. and will run from 5 to 8 p.m. The public is encouraged to attend and share its input about energy options they believe should be pursued for heating plants in the city.
District Court Judge John Shabaz ruled that the UW-operated Charter Street heating plant, which uses coal, was in violation of the Federal Clean Air Act when it failed to install proper pollution controls during several renovations of the site.
UW has since entered an agreement with the Sierra Club to conduct a feasibility study about alternative energy options at Charter Street and three other plants in the city.
State Building Commission Secretary David Helbach said the university and the state have appropriated $1.2 million to “look at options to not only meet the lawsuit” requirements, but to go beyond them to find the best options for the community.
“We had identified problems at Charter Street and Capital Heating, but the lawsuit brought it to a head that something has to be done,” Helbach said.
Bruce Nilles, a Midwest representative of the Sierra Club, called the study a “legitimate step forward.”
According to Nilles, Dane County currently violates federal standards for air particulate matter, and the Madison lakes have fish consumption advisories because of high mercury content. He added coal plants are the biggest contributors to these problems.
Helbach said community input is important because of the project’s high cost. He added the state is curious about how much people are willing to pay for cleaner energy.
According to Helbach, he is looking for creative ideas, and he believes the university community will be able to provide them.
“In the center of the greatest university in the country, we have a power plant,” he said. “We could use it as a research lab for biofuel research. We could mix the mission of the university with providing energy for the future.”
Helbach said shutting down the Charter Street plant is not an option because it heats and cools all campus buildings. If it only provided electricity, UW could just purchase the electricity from somewhere else, he said.
Nilles said according to the terms of the agreement, UW needs to select an alternative to relying solely on coal by July. He added there will be another town meeting in June before the final decision is made. Right now people have the opportunity to help decide which options will be considered.
“This is one of the most significant decisions our community is going to make about its future,” Nilles said. “It will shape our environment for decades to come.”
Anonymous (February 20, 2008 @ 8:53am):
GREAT WAY TO HAVE A LOCATION CLOSE TO WHERE PEOPLE LIVE - EXTREMELY CONVENIENT FOR STUDENTS GAHHHH
Anonymous (February 20, 2008 @ 9:34am):
"it heats and cools all campus buildings"
Co-genereation is a smart thing. There are ways to burn coal cleanly and sequester the CO2.
The real solution is pebble bed nuclear power.
Anonymous (February 20, 2008 @ 1:39pm):
A coal fired co-generation plant (steam and electricity) is exactly the right solution for UW-Madison heating and electricity needs. Enhancements to combusiton and exhaust scrubbers can be made to bring the emmissions into compliance with the tightened EPA requirements.
As the growing body of scientific data, common sense, and this winters deep cold continue to refute the false claims of global warming, Wisconsin should consider the merits of alternate energy generation methods based on straight forward economic analyses devoid of any Global Warming chimera. Coal provides the lowest cost of production and greatest economic return for the tax payer dollars spent. At current usage rates, the US has proven coal reserves to meet the needs of the entire country for 250 years. Coal is inexpensive, as compared to most other energy sources. It is durable and simply stored in open piles, requiring no additional protection measures. It is easily tranportable by rail and ship. If can be converted into liquid fuels to offset demand for foreign oil. It is the single best choice for our energy needs, throughout this century and next.
Engineer Alumni
Anonymous (February 20, 2008 @ 8:46pm):
Clearly, you do not understand the "scientific data" that you cite if you think that global climate change is projected to raise temperatures across the board. That is why it is now known as global climate change, not global warming.
Add a comment
We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.
Login...
Not registered? Sign up now.
It's quick, free, and the email address you provide will not be sold or solicited.
