Obama packs Kohl Center

Enlarge image

Obama packs Kohl Center

JAKE NAUGHTON/Herald photo

Also by Tom Schalmo:
Sharing Tools:

E-mail this article:




by Tom Schalmo
Wednesday, February 13, 2008 01:20

Coming off of victories in the Potomac primaries, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., visited Madison Tuesday night to gear up for next week’s Wisconsin primary.

Obama easily won primaries in Virginia, Maryland and Washington D.C. and used a Kohl Center platform to fire up the crowd for Tuesday’s big primary in Wisconsin.

With hundreds of local and national media members in attendance, the more than 19,000 people who filled the Kohl Center watched CNN on the projection screen and cheered as the results from the Potomac primaries came in.

“Today, the change we see swept through the Chesapeake and over the Potomac,” Obama said.

With Virginia and Maryland under his belt, Obama has won eight states in a row.

“Next Tuesday here in Wisconsin, we’re going to make it nine,” Gov. Jim Doyle, who has endorsed Obama, said while introducing the senator.

According to Public Policy Polling figures released Tuesday, Obama holds a wide lead in Wisconsin over rival Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y. The poll showed 50 percent of state voters behind Obama, with 39 percent for Clinton.

Obama’s common themes of change and hope dominated his speech Tuesday.

“It’s time to turn a page and start a new chapter,” Obama said. “We need a new direction in this country. Everywhere I go, I run into people who can’t wait another day for change.”

With Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., cementing himself as the frontrunner of the Republican race for the nomination, Obama criticized him for his stances on the war in Iraq.

“When I am the nominee, I will offer a clear choice,” Obama said. “John McCain won’t be able to say that I ever supported this war in Iraq because I opposed it from the start.”

Obama added McCain saying United States troops could be in Iraq for 100 years is “reason enough not to give him four years in the White House.”

Rep. Gordon Hintz, D-Oshkosh, attended the Kohl Center event after endorsing Obama last fall.

Hintz said the race between Clinton and Obama will be very close next week.

“I think it’s going to be a tight race, but I’ll do whatever I can to help him out,” Hintz said.

Hintz added the more exposure people have of Obama, the better his odds will be.

Obama also picked up the endorsement of Madison Mayor Dave Cieslewicz Tuesday. Cieslewicz previously endorsed former Sen. John Edwards, who dropped out of the race earlier this month.

Oliver Kiefer, chair of UW College Democrats, also said it remains too early to tell who the Democratic frontrunner is in Wisconsin but added the picture “will shape up on Saturday and Sunday.”

Kiefer said Clinton will likely stay in Wisconsin after her appearance in Milwaukee Saturday all the way through the Tuesday primary. The College Democrats will not endorse a specific candidate and will support whoever the nominee is.

On the Republican side, McCain and former Gov. Mike Huckabee both announced plans to travel to the state in the coming days.

Huckabee will stop in Madison Friday morning at 9:45 a.m. at the Concourse Hotel while McCain will make stops in Oshkosh, La Crosse and Milwaukee throughout the day Friday.

On the Republican side of the Public Policy Polling data, McCain holds a 53-32 advantage over the underdog Huckabee.

Obama’s rally did meet one brief distraction: During his speech, two men held up signs reading “911 Truth Now” and “WTC 7.” Officials escorted the two out about 10 minutes into the speech.


Feedback
Anonymous (February 13, 2008 @ 1:59am):

My husband works for a global corporation in Atlanta. Here's his comments from an informal survey he is doing with his business colleagues:
"I am doing a survey of people here and so far it is running at 100% of the respondents believe that Barack voted against the Iraq war.
0% knew that he in fact was NOT a member of the senate and could NOT vote for or against the war".
Now that Senator Obama is a member of Congress, his voting record on funding the Iraq war is similar to Senator Clinton. Ask yourself this question, why do Obama supporters think he voted against the war in Iraq vs. the fact that he simply spoke out against it when he was NOT a Congressional member?

Anonymous (February 13, 2008 @ 5:14am):

Its a question of judgment, not of semantics. Obama possesses, and did possess 5 years ago, the proper forethought and judgment to know that switching fronts from Afghanistan to Iraq was a bad idea. It is not over the trivial notion of whether he hit "Yea" or "Nay" in the Senate chamber, its the fact that he possessed a greater understanding than did his opponent on whether this war was a good idea.
By continually demonstrating to the public that he was against the war to begin with, he is showing the electorate, that, unlike Clinton, he can not be persuaded to support a policy just because the fickle public opinion supports it. Clinton was manipulated by the public and more so by the Bush adiminstration...Obama, on the other hand, is un-maniputable, his stance on the Iraq war proves just that.

Anonymous (February 13, 2008 @ 5:27am):

wow... this "informal survey" seems really legitimate. I wonder what the margin of error might be.

Anonymous (February 13, 2008 @ 8:36am):

What an inspiring speaker and man. After coming of age in the Bush era, I am so ready for a president who can see and act on the bigger picture in a holistic way. OBAMA 08!

Anonymous (February 13, 2008 @ 9:30am):

"The question is, Can you eat hope? Can you wear hope? When your hose is foreclosed, can you live in a house made of hope? I think the answer is no. Give me a president who is competent and who can bring results." -NY Times Letter to the Editor

Anonymous (February 13, 2008 @ 10:59am):

I'm so tired of grand-standing democrats using motivational speeches to deceive uninformed voters. No matter how good a candidate makes you feel or how much you believe that you can make a difference, you still have to look at the facts. What does this candidate stand for? What do they want to do? How are they going to do it? There isn't any form of intelligent substance and it's embarassing to be included in a group of people that support such candidates.

Anonymous (February 13, 2008 @ 12:43pm):

It's amazing that so many people seem to rely on presidential speeches to find out what a candidate plans to do in office. These events are meant to generate favorable sound bites and video clips, and represent an absurdly inefficient forum for policy explication. To those complaining that Obama (or anyone else) doesn't stand for anything, or hasn't outlined any policy goals, I would recommend visiting his website and looking around before jumping to conclusions about what he does and does not believe in.

Anonymous (February 13, 2008 @ 2:14pm):

Am I the only one who thought his first name was Obama? When I found out that his first name was Barry, I was all like wtf.

Anonymous (February 13, 2008 @ 7:10pm):

"Am I the only one who thought his first name was Obama? When I found out that his first name was Barry, I was all like wtf."

HURRRR

Anonymous (February 14, 2008 @ 3:26am):

You know, people support people for various reasons. Maybe they are looking for the best candidate on one issue, maybe they support them because of 1 speech, maybe it is because they are a black man, or a woman or a southern Baptist, maybe it is because they really researched and like the person or they thought "I'd like to have a beer with that man." Who knows, people support for stupid reasons, right reasons, wrong reasons, educated reasons, but they support. The greatest gift we have as Americans is our freedom, freedom to feel what we like, say what we like, support who we like and VOTE how we like.

Anonymous (February 14, 2008 @ 12:19pm):

Building 7 Proves the Wizard is just a man behind the curtain {} The Towers were ALSO pulled in a much less conventional takedown technique! {} GO BADGER TRUTHERS! {} 9/11 was a security-free, 3 demolition staged event. The newest Penta-patsies are patsies only! Awake or Perish! Love, NYC.

Anonymous (February 18, 2008 @ 8:56am):

No one is ever elected based on their platform. Elections are based on who connects based with the American public. Unfortunately, Hillary is HORRIBLE at connecting with everyday people. She lacks any style or charisma, which you need to get elected. This is why Bush won over Gore. Gore lack charisma, and Bush used his down homestyle to lure voters away. Same could be said for Bill Clinton.

Anonymous (February 19, 2009 @ 2:36am):

We love u obama!

Add a comment

We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.

Login...



   Remember me


Not registered? Sign up now.

It's quick, free, and the email address you provide will not be sold or solicited.

...or Post Your Comment Anonymously

Anonymous

Place a shout-out!
Top Classified Ads (view all)

Place your classified ad online and have it show up here. Your ad will hit thousands of viewers a day!

DON'T READ ME! Too late. If you're reading this, guess how many other people are reading it. See... advertising in The Badger Herald does work!

Place a classified ad

Advertising