News

Educators tackle inequality in state

Educators tackle inequality in state

Enlarge image

JAKE NAUGHTON/Herald photo

Also by Lauren Pagel:
Sharing tools:

E-mail this article:




 

Vote 0 Votes

A panel of education experts hosted by Teach for America discussed inequality in the state public education system during a presentation at University of Wisconsin Monday.

About 50 UW student audience members gathered in the University of Wisconsin’s Red Gym to participate in the discussion.

The panel included UW professor of curriculum and instruction Carl Grant, Indian Mound Middle School principal Dave Witte, Assistant State Superintendent for the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Carolyn Stanford Taylor and UW professor of education Michael Olneck.

Panelists said they came from diverse backgrounds and had different life experiences, but added they all shared a common passion for fostering equal opportunities in public education.

UW junior Ali Treviño-Murphy said the panelists made a big impact on her because she is particularly interested in equality in education. She added she was “further inspired by the people on this panel and their commitment to inclusive education.”

The panelists presented to the audience a “snapshot” of Wisconsin’s achievement gap. They said there is a disparity in academic performance between groups of students based on gender, race and socioeconomic status.

Olneck, who focuses on multiculturalism in education, provided an overview of the statistics from Wisconsin by sighting numerous results from the 2007 National Assessment of Educational Progress, also known as “the National Report Card.”

According to this report, 60 percent of black eighth-graders scored below basic level on national progress tests compared to 17 percent of white students, 23 percent of Asian students and 42 percent of Hispanic students.

Only 8 percent of black students scored proficient, compared to 38 percent of white students. Black students had an average score lower than that of white students by 38 points.

“Reading scores for fourth- and eighth-grade black students in Wisconsin were dead last in the U.S. in 2007,” Olneck said.

The panelists said teachers are not trained properly to handle diversity.

“This achievement gap includes more than just one gap,” Grant said. “Political, economic, social and health gaps all feed into the education gap, but the problem can’t be reduced to blaming the circumstances of the student. What about teacher preparation?” Taylor also stressed the crucial role of educators.

“We have to look at the people who are in these classrooms, at the instructors,” she said. “Are they the best teachers out there? Probably not. If 50 percent of the students are not getting it, the problem is not with the students but with the educators.”

UW junior Jason Hale asked the panelists, “What have you done to minimize this gap?”

Witte said educating educators is the most important way to minimize the education gap. “I make sure teachers have an awareness of the diverse circumstance of their students so that they can then help their students,” he added.


1 Comment | Leave a comment

You can talk openly about dogs without being politically incorrect. All domestic dogs, from Chihuahua to Great Dane, are single species canis familiaris; breed genetic differences result from enforced separations by breeders/trainers over 800 years. Similarly, all humans are a single species homo sapiens; race differences resulted from separation over thousands of years by geographic barriers. Dog breeds and human races are directly analogous as sub-groups within their respective single species.

Much can be learned from studying dogs; medical science does a great deal of this to avoid experimentation on humans. The brain is no exception, as dog brain structure and information flow processes are quite similar to that in humans. Numerous dog brain studies to analyze human brain diseases/conditions are in the medical literature.

Any experienced dog breeder will acknowledge the profound influence of genetics on intelligence and behavior. Traits such as trainability, aggression, are highly heritable and difficult to modify. Evaluations of dog intelligence have developed breed rankings according to ease of training and reliability of correct response to learned commands (analogous to education and testing in humans). Among dog breeds, there is a huge Achievement Gap, and it is GENETIC.

Humans are not exempt from the fundamental rules of biology. For humans, there is a mountain of relevant peer-reviewed research by well-credentialed scholars; numerous key citations are available in two recent books: Hart “Understanding Human History” and Lynn “Race Differences in Intelligence.” It isn’t fuzzy feel-good PC information, but it is indeed solid science…

Leave a comment

To comment anonymously or if signed in, leave name and e-mail blank.

Place a shout-out!
Top Classified Ads (view all)

HOUSES FOR Fall 2010. All houses are on W Dayton or N Bassett. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 bedrooms. All have parking. madisoncampusrentals.com

Place a classified ad

Advertising