NEWS
System fears cuts still deep
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Carl Jaeger:
- Many eager to pick chancellor (December 11, 2007)
- Officials debate Wiley's legacy (December 10, 2007)
- 'No guarantee' in UW success (December 10, 2007)
- New rules apply for UW seg fees (December 7, 2007)
- Regents hear about booze, textbooks (December 7, 2007)
Related Stories:
- Wiley expresses frustration with budget; hints at tuition raise (February 20, 2003)
- Reilly details goals of system, regents (October 4, 2004)
- UW: Let's see it in ink, Doyle (February 1, 2007)
- Legislature, regents speculate over predicted UW budget cuts (February 5, 2003)
- Admissions freeze lifted (March 24, 2002)
by Carl Jaeger
Friday, October 12, 2007
Two prominent University of Wisconsin System officials issued a statement Thursday analyzing Gov. Doyle's proposed budget.
UW System president Kevin Reilly and Board of Regents president Mark Bradley stressed the importance of sufficiently funding the UW System in the still undecided state budget.
The statement expressed appreciation for the new budget Gov. Doyle proposed early this week, but said it does not fund the university in a manner in which it can thrive.
Gov. Doyle's new budget includes a $25 million UW System cut, compared to the Republican-run Assembly's budget, which includes a $120 million UW System cut.
"We urge the governor and the Legislature to restore full funding to our university, and to do so quickly," the statement said. "With swift legislative action, the state can restore the flow of financial aid to hard-working students and help avoid drastic cuts or tuition surcharges next semester."
More than the alternatives, UW System spokesperson David Giroux said the fact that there still is no budget "is the scariest situation of all."
"Having no budget this year is a complete and utter disaster," Giroux said. "The governor's budget helps avoid that, while still expecting us to do some belt-tightening."
Giroux did say, however, that the governor's new budget is "the best option that's out there."
"We're moving in the right direction," Giroux said. "I think it speaks volumes when a $25 million cut seems attractive."
Gov. Doyle spokesperson Carla Vigue said "there has not been a bigger advocate for the university than Gov. Doyle."
"He has stated time and again that he will not sign a budget that includes the deep, deep cuts proposed by the Republican Assembly," Vigue said. "The governor is committed to ensure that everyone in the state has access to higher education."
Vigue added major priorities for Gov. Doyle include funding the UW System, providing sufficient financial aid for students in need and "insuring that the K-12 system is sound."
Giroux said the UW System is already suffering from repercussions due to the lack of a budget, as universities have been running on last year's budget, which does not take inflation into account.
"It's just a reality," Giroux said. "It's not crying wolf, it's not Chicken Little syndrome, it's just reality."
Anonymous (October 12, 2007 @ 8:47am):
The Assembly budget allocates increased funding for UW, not a "cut" as your story says. Stop the lies, behave as one should reasonably expect from university-educated journalists.
Anonymous (October 13, 2007 @ 12:56pm):
^ya the budget cuts are for the UW leaders salarys and all the worthless classes around. The "cuts" are only gonna effect their SALARY, thats why they're worried!!
Anonymous (October 13, 2007 @ 12:59pm):
Where to begin, 8:47? Should someone explain what "cost-to-continue" means? Or inflation? Or the fact that some costs increase (energy, to name just one)? Or that faculty will leave when they get better offers and that better offers cost more money?
The budget proposals mean real cuts to the UW. I am sorry if this upsets you so much you refuse to believe it, but it is true.
Anonymous (October 14, 2007 @ 4:16pm):
8:47 and 12:56 - Give us actual proof. Costs and inflation mean that there is a potential to lose faculty members and valuable classes. I am a student. I do not want to lose the benefit of being able to take specialized classes in my major (neuroscience) which will prepare me for grad school in the major. Neuroscience is a vital subject to study in today's growing world and helps us understand our own limits and our own perception.
Which of you are actually students or employees of the university? Have either of you gotten degrees or are you in the process of getting one?
Add a comment
We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.
Login...
Not registered? Sign up now.
It's quick, free, and the email address you provide will not be sold or solicited.
