NEWS
Reciprocity stalls amid protests
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Carl Jaeger:
- Many eager to pick chancellor (December 11, 2007)
- Officials debate Wiley's legacy (December 10, 2007)
- 'No guarantee' in UW success (December 10, 2007)
- New rules apply for UW seg fees (December 7, 2007)
- Regents hear about booze, textbooks (December 7, 2007)
Related Stories:
- Minnesota regents approve reciprocity agreement (October 15, 2007)
- Tuition deal to stay the same (March 8, 2007)
- Tax reciprocity with Minnesota preserved (February 25, 2002)
- Reciprocity deal continues (August 6, 2007)
- Minnesota reciprocity under scrutiny (September 29, 2003)
by Carl Jaeger
Monday, September 10, 2007
The University of Minnesota Board of Regents was set to finalize a new reciprocity agreement with the University of Wisconsin System Friday, but the meeting was abruptly canceled due to protesters.
The finalization was set to end a debate stemming back to last summer that could have potentially ended the 34-year pact between the neighboring states.
"The reciprocity agreement did not get its final approval today by the Board of Regents," U of M spokesperson Dan Wolter said Friday. "We are in the middle of a strike with [the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees] and there was a demonstration that caused the regents to adjourn their meeting early."
AFSCME, a group representing 3,500 health care, technical and clerical employees at the U of M, went on strike Tuesday due to the failure of the U of M to match their salaries with inflation.
According to U of M Student Regent Dan Engelman, approximately 100 protesters — mostly students — walked into the regents meeting around 9:30 a.m. Friday.
Engelman said U of M President Robert Bruininks had just delivered a report when U of M Regent Chair Patricia Simmons asked if any regents had questions for Bruininks.
At that point, Engelman said, a protester yelled, "We want to know when there’s going to be a fair contract for the workers at this university."
The regents decided to recess, and as many of them attempted to leave to room, five protesters blocked the exit and were eventually arrested by the U of M Police Department, Engelman said.
The regents ultimately decided to cancel the remainder of the meeting.
Although the reciprocity deal was not completely finalized, Wolter said the agreement is much closer to being resolved.
"The agreement received unanimous approval from the committee that it passed through [Thursday]," Wolter said. "It's definitely a step closer to being finalized on the University of Minnesota end, but it still has one more step to go through."
The agreement will most likely be finalized at the next meeting, if not before, Wolter said.
The delay will not alter the current reciprocity decision in any way, as the new agreement will not become effective until fall 2008.
Connie Hutchison, executive director of the Wisconsin Higher Educational Aids Board, was also not worried about the delay, calling the approval by the U of M Board of Regents a "formal step."
"The University of Minnesota has been involved in the process from the very beginning, and I'm confident that it will be approved," Hutchison said, adding that she anticipates the agreement will be approved the next time the regents get together.
The U of M Board of Regents issued a statement regarding the incident, saying "the University of Minnesota will neither tolerate nor condone the actions of individuals who intentionally disrupt our educational or governance processes."
"As citizens, these individuals were provided with the same opportunity to attend and observe the meeting of the Board of Regents as would be afforded anyone," the statement said. "Unfortunately, once afforded this opportunity, these individuals engaged in activities that transcend freedom of expression and were illegal."
The statement also said the U of M Board of Regents believed the actions of those involved in the specific protest were not reflective of AFSCME as a whole.
Anonymous (September 10, 2007 @ 1:38pm):
Sure, they have the ability to "attend" meetings, but do they really have the opportunity to have their voices heard, especially as residents of Minnesota and students at the university? And really, what do you expect when you give workers a pay cut while administrators and politicians get raises?
Anonymous (September 10, 2007 @ 2:03pm):
"what do you expect when you give workers a pay cut while administrators and politicians get raises?"
Opps - sounds like the real world in general may have caught up to them. Big business is like that everywhere you go.
Anonymous (September 10, 2007 @ 6:47pm):
Get over it, people. This is not your commie utopia and it never will be.
Anonymous (September 11, 2007 @ 1:20am):
If cost of living increases are evil and communist... what an f-ed up world.
Michael Gray-Jordan (September 11, 2007 @ 8:00pm):
"We want to know when there's going to be a fair contract for the workers at this university."
Reasonable question!
I want to be certain that everyone understands that this question went unanswered. The President of the University of Minnesota and the Regents didn't even feel that the question...DESERVED AN ANSWER!
Oh well, we'll ask again at the next Regents' meeting. Maybe they can get their thoughts together by then.
Add a comment
We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.
Login...
Not registered? Sign up now.
It's quick, free, and the email address you provide will not be sold or solicited.
