NEWS
Lawmakers debate judicial campaign finance regulations
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Pedro Oliveira Jr.:
- Falk admits errors on 911 call (May 7, 2008)
- Band allegations include sexual fondling (October 9, 2008)
Related Stories:
- Robson announces reform bills (April 27, 2007)
- Finance reforms facing long road (February 29, 2008)
- Democrats push finance proposal (April 10, 2007)
- Study prompts campaign-finance debate (February 15, 2002)
- Campaign-finance reform pushed to the back burner (February 26, 2003)
Share This:
by Pedro Oliveira Jr.
Wednesday, May 2, 2007
A Senate committee discussed legislation Tuesday that would reform campaign finance regulations for state Supreme Court candidates.
One bill would increase public financing for judicial candidates and another would impose regulations on issue advertising, in which advertisements comment on issues rather than candidates.
State Sen. Pat Kreitlow, D-Chippewa Falls, a sponsor of the public financing bill, said it would ensure the impartiality of candidates' decisions.
The proposed bill would increase the amount of tax money available to candidates running for the Supreme Court in primary and general elections.
"It's a way of putting elections back into the hands of people," Kreitlow said at the hearing.
Opponents of the bill said it would not be fair for the citizens of Wisconsin to pay for the campaigns of Supreme Court candidates whom they may not support.
However, others in attendance testified in favor of the legislation.
Angela Dentice, of the Wisconsin Academy of Trial Lawyers, said the organization's board of directors has endorsed the bills since it is concerned with the escalating cost of elections.
"Financing raises questions of bias and honesty," Dentice said.
The second bill discussed, which faces powerful opposition from many lobbying groups, would regulate political ads and require nonpolitical groups to disclose certain information of donors.
Under current law, outside interest groups may advertise issues without reporting financial information to the Wisconsin Elections Board.
Under the proposed bill, organizations that do not comply could be subject to penalties.
Sen. Jon Erpenbach, D-Middleton, said advertisers would be less likely to create sensationalist propaganda if they have to disclose their identities.
Susan Armacost, legislative director of Wisconsin Right to Life, opposed the bill and said Wisconsin has no need for "speech nannies."
She said the organization does not endorse or support candidates, but instead raises awareness in subjects relevant to the elections.
Many members' participation is based upon anonymity, Armacost added, and said they would be less likely to join organizations if their information would have to be disclosed.
The committee also heard testimony regarding the "Judicial Right-to-Know Act," which would require county clerks to inform parties in a lawsuit of any conflicts of interest the presiding judge may have.
Legislators said the bill is a response to the current controversy surrounding state Supreme Court Justice-elect Annette Ziegler over her hearing of several cases involving a bank that employed her husband on its board of directors.
Anonymous (May 2, 2007 @ 10:09pm):
Yeah, elections definately need more government to regulate those who run the government. I see no problem here.
- Germain E. Stemme
Add a comment
We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.
Login...
Not registered? Sign up now.
It's quick, free, and the email address you provide will not be sold or solicited.
