NEWS
Grainger Hall tuition to rise
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Nick Penzenstadler:
- For whom the bell tolls (November 29, 2007)
- New apartments for West Wash? (November 20, 2007)
- One-and-out: Kumar will not seek 2nd term on Dane County Board (November 15, 2007)
- Displaced Carroll residents call university, bookstore helpful (November 13, 2007)
- Carroll Street fire displaces students (November 12, 2007)
Related Stories:
- Tuition may rise at Grainger (January 23, 2007)
- Board to settle tuition debate (April 13, 2007)
- Engineers wait for tuition hike (August 31, 2007)
- Regents to vote on Business School tuition hike (April 12, 2007)
- In-Depth: Spending money to make money (April 26, 2007)
by Nick Penzenstadler
Monday, April 16, 2007
OSHKOSH — The University of Wisconsin Board of Regents approved a differential tuition plan for undergraduate business students at their meeting Friday, which will require students enrolled in the Business School to pay more tuition per semester than others.
Students in the UW Business School will pay an extra $500 per semester, and students receiving a certificate in the business program will pay an additional $150 per semester.
Though the plan passed, several regents expressed concern about student involvement in the plan.
Student Regents Christopher Semenas and Thomas Shields pointed out that the Associated Students of Madison was not involved in the process and added it was forwarded to the regents with the support of the non-shared governance group Undergraduate Business Leadership Council.
Provost Patrick Farrell was on hand to defend the process UW used to gather student opinions, the issue that dominated the debate.
"Their concerns were some that we had, too. We had a good amount of high-quality input," Farrell said. "There did seem to be a lot of focus on that and little focus on the need … and the benefits that would go to students."
In response to concerns of student involvement in the decision, School of Business Dean Mike Knetter said in a phone interview with The Badger Herald that the school simply followed the procedure they were given from the UW System to gather input.
"We decided since it was not attached to courses, but the business major, it was important to talk to business students," Knetter said. "[The students] see the benefits of the program, so they can assess whether they think it'll be used to their benefit."
UW System President Kevin Reilly said a committee is analyzing the process for decisions with student involvement and will present their findings in June.
And Regent Elizabeth Burmaster said she was initially concerned with the $1,000 per year increase and added she was won over by Knetter at the committee presentation Thursday.
"The biggest issue I had was the worry of the sticker shock," Burmaster said. "It's such a large increase. Would that deter students, including low- and middle-income students?"
Knetter said he was relieved with the regents' decision and explained the 25 percent commitment to financial aid programs will help retain students who cannot afford the difference.
With a continual decrease in state funding, Knetter said they were faced with the decision as a last resort.
"This isn't something we choose to do lightly," Knetter said. "Our financing is built on a partnership with students, alumni and the state. The state is doing what it can, but it's hard for it to keep up with the rate of growth and the cost. If we can't get the money from the state, where is it going to come from?"
When asked if he sees differential tuitions becoming a trend throughout all UW programs, Farrell said a unilateral increase is preferred.
"My personal preference would be to avoid differentials and get, in a sense, more tuition across the board," Farrell said. "It tends to make it look like there are special areas that are somehow privileged over others."
Anonymous (April 16, 2007 @ 8:00am):
Typical of the Regents, they love to line their pockets with student money but do nothing to help those who gave them a job. The Regents are nothing short of criminal. To actually lie and tell people the state cuts funding every year is horrid and a bold face lie. There has not been a year where the state has cut funding, they just don't give what everyone wants. The Regents all deserve to be fired before they steal any more of your money!!
Anonymous (April 16, 2007 @ 2:19pm):
I find it hard to believe, the UW would use class envy (or should I say success) as a tool to bilk more money from students. Of course, it is only fair that those who may make more money when they complete their education pay more ahead of time. Forget the fact that they have to WORK harder for it!! Time for the Regents to get a pay cut!!
Anonymous (April 16, 2007 @ 3:04pm):
In response to the previous comment, I fail to see how the regents are "lining their pockets" by approving a differential tuition for a specific degree program. I also fail to see how the regents personally benefit at all since the regents receive absolutely no compensation for their service.
frank rojas (April 16, 2007 @ 4:01pm):
The portion of state funding actually going to fund faculty and others on campus has declined substantially. The only portion that has increased lately is the portion that pays utlities and other fixed costs. You have no idea how poorly the UW budgets have been compared to many other similar schools. If you want a UW worthy of the name it's time to shutup and payup. UW tuition is very very low. Get a grip on reality.
Anonymous (April 16, 2007 @ 5:01pm):
The title is misleading. Several classes are held in Grainger Hall that do not belong to the business school. So it is not a Grainger Hall tuition rise, per se.
Anonymous (April 16, 2007 @ 7:01pm):
i agree with this hike. students in the business school get better treatment than those in letters and science so it's only fair that they pay more.
Anonymous (April 16, 2007 @ 8:38pm):
Glad I'm in a useless major.
- Germain E. Stemme
Anonymous (April 16, 2007 @ 10:00pm):
"students in the business school get better treatment than those in letters and science"
ROFLMAO
Scrawled on the wall in the B-School:
"Business students ar capitalist pigs"
Neatly printed underneath:
"Ridiculous, business students have no capital - they'll need to get a job, unlike the trust fund babies in liberal arts"
Anonymous (April 17, 2007 @ 7:44pm):
The truth is, it probably costs more to run a business school. B-school professors are paid more than other professors b/c that's what the market demands. The nicer facilities of Grainger are probably required to maintain the high caliber of students and faculty. Don't forget, discrimination in pricing exists today: in-state vs out-of-state, financial aid vs full-freight, and athletic scholarship vs non-athlete.
BBA 1997
Add a comment
We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.
Login...
Not registered? Sign up now.
It's quick, free, and the email address you provide will not be sold or solicited.
