News

New Bush library garners SMU ire

Also by Jessi Polsky:
Sharing tools:

E-mail this article:




Vote 0 Votes

President Bush's proposed presidential library complex at Southern Methodist University was met with outcry this week from university faculty members.

The complex would contain three parts: a library, a museum and the Bush Institute — a think tank that would host programs, symposiums and public speakers.

The Bush Institute would be a separate entity from the university and therefore would not report to SMU. However, the complex would be located on the university's campus in Dallas.

Protesters say that because the Bush Institute would be located on campus, it would inevitably be associated with the university.

Mathematics professor Richard Haberman said the general public would automatically draw connections between SMU and the institute due to its location.

"SMU's name is not even [on the institute] because it's independent," Haberman said. "In reality, most people would associate the two together."

Haberman called the Bush proposal extreme because it does not give SMU any control over the institute.

"The proposal given to SMU has the Bush Administration having complete control [over the Bush Institute]," Haberman said. "SMU administration accepted that without much negotiation."

Haberman said opponents at SMU fear the institute would promote both Bush and GOP policies at the university.

Art history professor Annemarie Weyl Carr said she fears the institute would promote Bush's policies at the expense of academic freedom.

"My concern is with how it would condition the intellectual life," Carr said. "Faculty would constantly be for or against the ideals of the institute."

Carr said the institute could infringe on academic freedoms because it would be fundamentally and ideologically motivated.

"The university is an institute that studies things [and should] not be bonded on the basis of promoting an ideology," Carr said.

Donald Downs, a University of Wisconsin political science professor, said a partisan institute would not necessarily impact academic freedoms.

"Academic freedom is a choice to set up an institute that does what it wants to do," Downs said. "[The Bush Institute] should get to pick who they want to bring in."

The UW has dozens of centers, Downs said, all of which individually choose speakers and programs to promote.

Patti LaSalle, associate vice president and executive director in the Office of Public Affairs at SMU, said the presidential library complex would have a variety of positive benefits, especially when asking for donations.

"The complex may be seen as a unique feature of SMU, which can be beneficial for admissions and contributions." LaSalle said.

She also said the library and its programs would benefit all SMU students.

"The library will make the most difference to students majoring in political science, law or history," LaSalle added.

Haberman said most universities with presidential library complexes have much larger student bodies than SMU, adding the university may not have the resources to accommodate such a large complex.

"The size of the institute could overwhelm resources at SMU," Haberman said.

Due to SMU's small size, the presidential library complex could have a large impact on the university, Downs said.

"The smaller the school, [the] more concern there should be," he added. "Madison is so big, no single center sets any kind of tone."


5 Comments | Leave a comment

user-pic

A Bush think-tank. Never thought I’d hear that.

user-pic

Ashok Kumar as a sensible politican? Never thought I’d hear that.

user-pic

Yeah, it’ll be the first Presidential Children’s Library…

user-pic

SMU should not go forward with the Bush Library it will cause many to abandon the Methodist Church… as happened with the Catholic Church when the Priest abuse of children was known.

Anonymous

user-pic

Anyone who thinks that the name Methodism or SMU should be associated with George W. Bush needs to read the book, Oath Betrayed: Torture, Medical Complicity, and the War on Terror by Dr. Steven Miles, professor of medicine at the University of Minnesota.

Professor Miles has based this volume on painstaking research and highly-credible resources, including eyewitness accounts, army criminal investigations, FBI debriefings of prisoners, autopsy reports, and prisoners' medical records. These documents tell a story strikingly different from the Bush administration version presented to the American people, revealing involvement at every level of government, from the Presbyterian former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to prison health-care personnel. The book also shows how the highest officials of government are complicit in this pattern of torture, including the Episcopalian Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez, United Methodist Vice President Dick Cheney and United Methodist President George W. Bush.

While much of the use of torture by the Central Intelligence Agency and Special Forces troops remains concealed, Dr. Miles documents how nineteen prisoners have been tortured to death by American military personnel. The book tells of an Afghan prisoner named Dilawar, an innocent 22-year-old, who drove his taxi to “the wrong place at the wrong time.” At the U.S. detention center in Bagram, Afghanistan, in December 2002 Dilawar was suffocated, shackled and then suspended by his arms. When he was beaten with a baton, he cried out "Allah, Allah," which amused the soldiers and triggered more merciless blows. The official report reads that he was beaten over a five day period until his legs were, in the words of the coroner, “pulpified.” He was then chained to the ceiling of his cell, where he died. Although an autopsy stated that Dilawar’s death was a homicide, General Daniel McNeil told reporters that Dilawar had died of natural causes on the grounds that one of his coronary arteries was partly occluded. The words “coronary artery disease” were typed in a different font on the prisoner’s death certificate.

Up 90 percent of the prisoners detained in the Bush "war on terror" have been found to be unjustifiably imprisoned and without intelligence value. In addition, much of the hideous work of torture is out-sourced by the Bush administration to countries like Uzbekistan, Syria and Egypt where torture is a long-standing and common practice. In July 2004, the British ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, who grew up in a devout Methodist home, protested the Uzbek intelligence service’s interrogation practices: “Tortured dupes are forced to sign up to confessions showing what the Uzbek government wants the U.S. and UK to believe… . This material is useless — we are selling our souls for dross.”

Torture is a crime against humanity and a violation of every human rights treaty in existence, including the Geneva Conventions which prohibit cruel and degrading treatment of detainees. Torture is as profound a moral issue in our day as was slavery in the 19th century. It represents a betrayal of our deepest human and religious values as a civilized society.

David Hackett Fischer describes in his Pulitzer Prize winning book, Washington’s Crossing, how thousands of American prisoners of war were "treated with extreme cruelty by British captors," during the Revolutionary War. There are numerous accounts of injured soldiers who surrendered being murdered and Americans dying in prison ships in New York harbor of starvation and torture.

After crossing the Delaware River and winning his first battle at Trenton, New Jersey on Christmas Day, 1776, George Washington ordered his troops to give refuge to hundreds of surrendering foreign mercenaries. “Treat them with humanity,” Washington instructed his troops. “Let them have no reason to complain of our copying the brutal example of the British army.”

Contrast this with the September 15, 2006, Washington Post lead editorial titled "The president goes to Capitol Hill to lobby for torture." "President Bush rarely visits Congress. So it was a measure of his painfully skewed priorities that Mr. Bush made the unaccustomed trip yesterday to seek legislative permission for the CIA to make people disappear into secret prisons and have information extracted from them by means he dare not describe publicly."

If the Bush Library and think tank are placed at SMU the United Methodist Church should withdraw its association from the University and demand that the good name of Methodism be removed from the name of the School. If the United Methodist Church can not take a stand against the use of torture and those who employ it, including President Bush, what does it stand for?

Andrew J. Weaver, Ph.D., is a United Methodist minister and research psychologist living in New York City. He has co-authored 12 books including: Counseling Survivors of Traumatic Events (Abingdon, 2003) and Reflections on Grief and the Spiritual Journey (Abingdon, 2005).

Leave a comment

To comment anonymously or if signed in, leave name and e-mail blank.

Place a shout-out!
Top Classified Ads (view all)

CAMP RANDALL/ENGINEERING: 304 Princeton Ave. 3 bdrm/ bath, or 4 bdrm/3 bath, partially furnished. Free heat and parking, dishwasher, A/C. $1,350-$1,530 or $1,800-$2,030/mo. Available Aug. 15. 608-255-7100.

Place a classified ad

Advertising