NEWS
Students urge Wiley to validate wage increases
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Nick Penzenstadler:
- Cartoon attacks David Horowitz (May 6, 2008)
- Organization confident 'Sex Toys 101' will go on (May 1, 2008)
- Law School shuts down 'Sex Toys 101' talk (April 30, 2008)
- McCain drives economic line (April 17, 2008)
- McCain stopping in state today (April 16, 2008)
Related Stories:
- Wiley to adjust student wages (November 30, 2006)
- Bazzell: UW may not honor Living Wage vote (October 25, 2006)
- Wiley, students talk LTE logistics (April 28, 2006)
- Wiley to decide on wage disclosure for UW manufacturing (January 23, 2004)
- Students approve budgets (February 20, 2007)
Share This:
by Nick Penzenstadler
Tuesday, April 10, 2007
Two University of Wisconsin students sent a dissenting message to Chancellor John Wiley Monday, urging him to approve a controversial wage increase policy for UW workers.
Nick Limbeck and Ashok Kumar, both student government representatives on the Student Wage Committee — created to discuss increasing student workers' wages at University Health Services, Rec Sports and the Wisconsin Union — demanded Wiley comply with student elections or allow students to take part in bargaining for wages and benefits.
According to Kumar, the living wage referendum to increase employee wages passed on three consecutive Associated Students of Madison elections, which he said UW was legally bound to validate.
"We demand that the university comply with the statutory autonomy students have over segregated fees and shared governance laws set forth by case law and state statutes," the letter to Wiley said.
However, according to UW spokesperson John Lucas, UW administrators are not looking at the referendums as binding and because of state statutes they are not able to bargain with students over wages.
Kumar, though, pointed to the Student Union Initiative referendum — when students approved millions of dollars of segregated fee funding for the renovation of Memorial Union and a new Union South — as a counterexample of UW administrators taking the student vote into account.
"They don't have the authority," Kumar said. "There's no case law to back up which initiative they agree with and then pick that one."
With regard to the students' leverage with administrators, Lucas said UW System policy guarantees students an advisory role in the budgeting of non-allocable fees, but that the final decisions are at the discretion of the chancellor. The Board of Regents, meanwhile, has the final say in determining the budgeting of segregated university fees.
Last November, Wiley first responded to the student election and pointed out that the average pay of the 7,000 student hourly workers is $9.03. Wiley made the distinction between student workers and those looking to raise a family under the "living wage."
According to Tomas Garcia, human resource director for the Wisconsin Unions, Wiley then formed a committee to look at "fair market" wages around the area for students.
"The committee's charge was basically to talk about whether student wages should go up, and typically if they do, it would be what's happening in the market, like other vendors on State Street," said Garcia, who sat on the committee.
As a large employer of students on campus, Garcia said if the living wage were enacted, the Wisconsin Union would be forced to go against traditional staffing procedures and hire fewer students due to budget constraints.
Garcia said although he understands the student perspective, the language of living wage must be interpreted as someone raising a family and not attending school.
"I can understand why the students would want that wage, but unfortunately they are for families and not [for] a student," Garcia said. "Your main goal is to be there and get educated and not to make a lot of money."
Anonymous (April 10, 2007 @ 3:36am):
Dear Ashok Kumar,
Please go back to "serving us" at the Dane County Board of Supervisors.
Love,
-UW Students
Anonymous (April 10, 2007 @ 5:40am):
Ashok, where you at?
Anonymous (April 10, 2007 @ 9:17am):
The whole point, which was missed by the article, was that Ashok and Nick wanted to step down, and wanted an apparatus to be formed where student workers could elect their peers to the committee.
Anonymous (April 10, 2007 @ 1:08pm):
lol I love the BH
Anonymous (April 10, 2007 @ 3:13pm):
According to Kumar, the living wage referendum to increase employee wages passed on three consecutive Associated Students of Madison elections, which he said UW was legally bound to validate.
Yes, the living wage was passed...there is no doubt about that. What Ashok and Nick are failing to realize is that the living wage is for people supporting a family of four. Last time I checked there are very few (if any students) working for UHS, Rec Sports and the WU. I work at for the Wisconsin Union and personally think it would be a bunch of crap to make that much money. If students want to lose their jobs in these areas because they can no longer afford to pay them, so be it. But I love my job and would prefer to keep it!
Anonymous (April 10, 2007 @ 4:32pm):
3:13- What you fail to realize is that immediately after the LTE policy was passed last year, administrators began preparing to "solve" the LTE problem not by converting them to Full Time positions, but by converting the positions to student jobs--the new bottom line.
Thus, the point of a blanket wage is to eliminate classes of workers (I mean set the wage based on the job performed, not not based on who's doing it), in part to preserve working class jobs as well.
Anonymous (April 10, 2007 @ 10:24pm):
Do you think Ashok cares? No.... it's more shit for him to brag about at the Plaza or tout off when he runs for re-election in April.
Add a comment
We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.
Login...
Not registered? Sign up now.
It's quick, free, and the email address you provide will not be sold or solicited.
