NEWS
Loan incentives in question
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Cassie Kornblau:
- Incumbent Kind knocks down Barrett challenge (November 5, 2008)
- Supporting McCain amid Obamamania (October 27, 2008)
- Social media conquer politics (October 23, 2008)
- UW fundraising shaken (October 22, 2008)
- The graying of UW faculty (October 9, 2008)
Related Stories:
- College aid agents fight ethics claims (March 22, 2007)
- Aid chief steps off advisory board (April 12, 2007)
- National student loan scandal strikes Milwaukee campus (April 11, 2007)
- College scandal hits UW schools (April 18, 2007)
- Regents vote on marketing rights (April 16, 2007)
Share This:
by Cassie Kornblau
Monday, March 19, 2007
Colleges and universities across the country may be receiving financial incentives from student loan companies, according to an announcement made Friday by New York's Attorney General.
In a letter obtained by The Badger Herald, New York Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo described the problematic practices uncovered in his review of the current relationship between educational systems and loan companies. Cuomo pointed especially to the establishment of preferred-lender lists.
Under the current system, a preferred-lender list is a financial relationship that provides financial benefits to universities in exchange for inclusion of the company on their list.
The problem, Cuomo said in the letter, is the preferred-lender lists do not disclose to students and parents the basis for the selection of the loan companies, like competitive up-front rates and repayment benefits or services. Cuomo said this lack of communication misleads students and parents, implying they are required to use only companies on the preferred-lender list.
"There is an unholy alliance between banks and institutions of higher education that may often not be in the students' best interest," Cuomo said in a release. "The financial arrangements between lenders and these schools are filled with the potential for conflicts of interest."
But Michelle Curtis, associate director of student financial services at the University of Wisconsin, said UW does not partake in such practices, adding she has yet to know of a school that has any financial arrangement benefiting the school.
"We do not have a preferred-lender list," Curtis said. "We use the top 90 percent of our volume, which is driven by student choice."
UW is not a priority school that makes money for profit, Curtis said, adding she is unsure as to what schools in particular Cuomo was referencing in the letter.
If a loan company exceeds a certain amount of business from a particular school, Curtis said some companies may put money back into a scholarship program as a way to give some money back to the schools.
"It is intended to be positive reinforcement," Curtis said. "I can't imagine a professional taking a trip to Hawaii on this deal."
But according to The New York Times, Education Finance Partners, a loan company that has a particular arrangement with Drexel University in Philadelphia, Pa., pays a percentage of private loan volume to the university.
"Education Finance Partners is, of course, cooperating with the Attorney General's office in this matter," Education Finance Partners spokesperson Jeff Dillow said in an interview with The Badger Herald. "At the core of our company's mission is to give back to the students we serve and help provide greater access to education."
Yet, Curtis said, across the country schools are no longer using public preferred-lender lists, and added this issue is not widespread in public universities. Action by the Attorney General, Curtis said, might actually cause universities to avoid arrangements with lenders altogether.
"What I think they are going to do is to scare schools into not listing any lenders," Curtis said. "Schools will be afraid because of liability."
Anonymous (March 19, 2007 @ 11:20pm):
Did the thought ever occur to the reporter and her editors that there may be nothing to this story? The role of the media is to exercise some independent judgement, not flack for a politically motivated witch hunt.
Anonymous (March 21, 2007 @ 2:01pm):
I could not agree more to the previous post. I just saw that CBS was forced to change thier story after the facts the portrayed were proven to be false. It would appear the AG of New York has decided to attack colleges and universities, based on rumors by a failing lender (My Rich Uncle) for his own political gain.
So to our own financial aid department, thank you for your hard work. We as students do not believe you are trying to rip us off, and unless something has changed since last time i was in your office, you do not appear to be recieving kickbacks.
to the writer, please becareful what you print, this appears to be an unnecissary and irresponsible article attacking a department that has helped everyone of us students.
Add a comment
We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.
Winter commenting hiatus
Comments have been turned off for the remainder of winter break. Look for our spring 2009 registration issue to come online at the start of the semester!
