NEWS
Seg fees might dip down
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Peter Sielski:
- City committee debates pending budget (September 11, 2007)
- Educating our veterans (September 6, 2007)
- Faculty vote to check records (May 8, 2007)
- Greeks 150 years young (May 7, 2007)
- Financial group elects '07 chair (May 7, 2007)
Related Stories:
- ASM saves more than $800,000 in fees (March 9, 2006)
- Students to decide where unspent segregated fees go (February 17, 2004)
- ASM to refund $757,000 in segregated fee reserves (March 9, 2005)
- Tuition may rise following council's decision (March 15, 2007)
- Student leaders present Wiley with budget proposals (March 13, 2002)
Share This:
by Peter Sielski
Friday, March 9, 2007
Student-segregated fees could decrease marginally as a result of the Associated Students of Madison Reserve Board meeting Thursday night.
The board decided to take the unknown remaining amount of money from allocable budgets and redirect it to potentially reducing the cost of segregated fees next year.
"Each year, students pay segregated fees, and these fees are not completely spent from allocable budgets, so all this money goes back into a pot," Finance Committee Chair Sree Atluru said. "What we did is we took that money and offset it for next year, so the segregated fee amount will be decreased."
Segregated fees for the current year, listed as $365 per semester — totaling up to a $730 tacked onto each student's tuition in an academic year — could be expected to drop marginally for 2007-2008, Atluru added.
The ASM Reserve Board also debated three group proposals for additional funding, as the ASM Student Elections Commission received funding to set up an electronic method of registering student votes.
"The SEC online system was still not available [last election] and paper voting was far more expensive," SEC Chair Leah Moe said. "Creating a new system was not cheap. We took the cheapest bid we could take."
According to Moe, the last online system that was set up for elections had failed and was "unsalvageable," requiring an all-new system.
Without the funding, Moe said the 2007 spring elections simply would not be possible, as they would not have the money to organize another election done by paper balloting.
"It benefits all students, as the election creates a stable, accessible and safe system for them," SEC representative Polly Pfeiffer said.
According to Pfeiffer, the additional funding would be a one-time expense because the new online system would make elections cheaper and more efficient. She added that this need for funding was due to unforeseeable events, since the previous online systems failure could not have been predicted.
However, before calling the budget to a final vote, Atluru asked to cut $2,000 slotted for advertising from the budget, as well as reduce funding for program supplies and office supplies.
"I don't understand the necessity for funding them at the full amount when they planned a budget for $4,000 to $5,000," Atluru said, regarding the advertising budget. "I want to give them the amount they budgeted for and nothing more."
The ASM Reserve Board approved the cuts and passed the budget of more than $33,000 by a unanimous vote.
The Campus Women's Center requested funds that mistakenly ended up in the hands of the Reserve Board.
"Something happened that was beyond Rich [Sterkowitz] and the Wisconsin Union Directorate," CWC representative Amanda Evenstone said. "We did all the paperwork and something just happened — it just got transferred back to unallocated."
Instead of going to a music committee to pay for their events, Evenstone said the slotted CWC funding landed into the hands of the Reserve Board, and she wanted those funds returned.
"It was a mystery why this happened," Student Services Finance Committee Chair Zach Frey said.
The committee restored CWC's $5581.46 proposal by a unanimous vote, and the Child Care Tuition Assistance Program also had its budget passed unanimously, receiving $40,000.
Anonymous (March 9, 2007 @ 9:37am):
does an action profile of sree atluru really have to be published along side every silly BH news article on an ASM meeting? don't you BH photographers have something better to do on weeknights? sure, she's cute--but not *that* cute
Anonymous (March 9, 2007 @ 11:49am):
shes also the most emotionally driven nutcase on the committee. She can't keep her cool for anything, she is angry all the time, and just a really mean person in general.
Anonymous (March 9, 2007 @ 1:40pm):
Dear Sir or Madame:
The last comment about Sree Atluru is uncalled for and very untrue. I have known Sree for a few years now and have worked with her often. As someone who knows her, I can honestly say that she is neither a "nutcase" nor is she a mean person. I think it is ridiculous of you to try to disparage her by trashing her sanity. If you do have issues with Sree I would think that you would be surer of your accusations of her to speak to her personally.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Anonymous (March 9, 2007 @ 2:52pm):
c'mon BH...use some discretion over what gets posted on these walls.
Anonymous (March 9, 2007 @ 7:54pm):
the first comments are wayyyy too personal
Anonymous (March 10, 2007 @ 11:56pm):
Yes Badger Herald, please censor these comments, in fact please form a committee to approve of the comments in at least 72 hours after they are submitted. Actually to save time and money just pay someone on your staff to put opinions on under different names so that you can always know who to blame and make sure that he knows how far is to far. Sift and Winnow Baby!
- Germain E. Stemme
Add a comment
We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.
Login...
Not registered? Sign up now.
It's quick, free, and the email address you provide will not be sold or solicited.
