NEWS
Committee upholds public hearing
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Keegan Kyle:
- Nothing to complain about? (December 12, 2007)
- Recruiting isn't easy on campus (December 7, 2007)
- Doyle set to sign off on ethics (February 2, 2007)
- Volunteerism on the road (October 19, 2007)
- Down and dirty on campus sanitation (October 11, 2007)
Related Stories:
- Students call for new rules (January 30, 2007)
- Student Judiciary meets at Capitol (October 15, 2007)
- Law students lose case (March 8, 2007)
- UWRCF gets new hearing (January 25, 2006)
- Students pick Grosskopf as 'chief' (May 8, 2007)
by Keegan Kyle
Tuesday, March 6, 2007
Members of the Student Judiciary ruled Monday that the committee's potentially illegal public hearing held late Sunday night was procedurally legitimate.
Representatives of the Associated Students of Madison could have challenged the meeting since the student court failed to properly notify the public 24 hours in advance of its meeting agenda.
Chief Justice Josh Tyack said the appeals meeting was mistakenly scheduled but needed to happen Sunday night for time reasons.
The Student Judiciary was scheduled to hear opinions from members of ASM and the UW Law School's Black Law Student Association, which filed litigation earlier this year claiming ASM violated viewpoint neutrality, due process and equal access to university funding regulations.
The student organization had been allocated $3,700 by the ASM Finance Committee toward a national convention trip, but that funding was later reduced by the Student Council to $600.
The student court had already delayed the appeal hearing and BLSA hopes to use the contested funding to register for the convention by the extended March 7 deadline.
After a closed session, the Student Judiciary voted 6-0 to legitimize Sunday's hearing. Tyack, who abstained from the vote, said he supported the group's decision because it corrected a mistake made by the Student Judiciary and the necessity to meet was immediate.
"Once again, I'd like to say I'm sorry for being the instigator of this boondoggle," said Tyack, who is responsible for scheduling the student court's meetings.
Tyack said he also approved the meeting because he said he cleared it through affected parties and there seemed to be no apparent objection.
Brandon Vaughn, a second-year UW law student who spoke on behalf of BLSA, said he was disappointed in the possibly illegal meeting but nonetheless supported the student court's decision.
"We find that the professionalism and lack of communication between ASM as well as the Judiciary Committee needs to be looked at," Vaughn said. "It is our effort that we all learn something from (this)."
Tyack said the Student Judiciary plans on delivering its official opinion on the case Wednesday.
Anonymous (March 6, 2007 @ 3:07pm):
Well well well....Ironic that after the Supreme Court of ASM rules to punish a university committee for not following open meeting laws the Chief Justice breaks them himself. Good thing that they can just rule in favor of themselves. Anyone still think that ASM is not corrupt or defunct?
- Germain E. Stemme
Anonymous (March 6, 2007 @ 3:35pm):
I'm pretty sure nobody would care/notice if they just stopped notifying people about their meetings.
Add a comment
We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.
Login...
Not registered? Sign up now.
It's quick, free, and the email address you provide will not be sold or solicited.
