News
Board approves UW admissions
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Cassie Kornblau:
- UW students dare to experiment with drugs (November 13, 2008)
- Incumbent Kind knocks down Barrett challenge (November 5, 2008)
- Supporting McCain amid Obamamania (October 27, 2008)
- Social media conquer politics (October 23, 2008)
- UW fundraising shaken (October 22, 2008)
The University of Wisconsin System Board of Regents voted unanimously Friday to allow all state universities to consider non-academic factors — including race — in their admissions decisions.
The Board of Regents had come under fire from some state lawmakers and civil activists since May 2006, when the regents announced that they would consider revising the freshman admissions policy to include race-based criteria.
Despite the criticism, the regents approved a new "holistic" approach to freshman admissions where factors such as socioeconomic status, race and extracurricular activities play into the admissions decisions, in addition to student's academic records.
The board argued that the freshman admissions policy — which is already in place at UW-Madison — does not violate Wisconsin state law and because it "complies" with the Supreme Court ruling of 2003 that allows race to be used as an admissions factor.
The debate over this decision drew national attention when a Fox News crew arrived at the regents' meeting Friday.
UW System spokesperson David Giroux said a report on the regents' decision aired on the program "Special Report" Saturday night on Fox News. Giroux said he thinks it is interesting that the story has received national attention but added there is confusion on this topic.
"It was clear [Fox News was] only interested in the myth that race would triumph over academics," Giroux said.
Responding to a question by a Fox News reporter about whether unqualified students would now be admitted because of the new admissions policy, Giroux said "there are no unqualified students in the UW System, and there will never be unqualified students here."
State Rep. Stephen Nass, R-Whitewater, said in an interview with The Badger Herald that it is "unfortunate" but "pretty typical" that all 18 members of the board would go along with the policy and hoped that at least one member would have raised some concern.
Nass added the governor appointed a "yes" board despite the policy that Nass believes will deny qualified applicants.
"There is no question that there are students at UW-Madison who will no longer be admitted despite having high GPAs and ACT scores because of the new admissions policy," Nass said.
Nass said this policy will remove qualified students from the state, citing an example of an applicant who was denied admission to UW-Madison. The student has a GPA of 3.5 and ACT score of 28, and now, according to Nass, is forced to attend Ohio State University because he does not fit "the mold of the [UW-Madison]."
Board of Regents President David Walsh said he understands this is a complicated issue, especially because people are hesitant to talk about the importance of a diverse campus. However, Walsh said there is a need to direct conversation toward the importance of diversity calling it an "educational benefit."
"Diversity isn't just race," Walsh said. "It's geography, it's the handicap, it's the veteran, it's the football player [who] all bring something else to campus."
Walsh also said he supports the policy because corporations want students who have experienced diversity so they are adequately prepared for the global workplace.
Regent Vice President Mark Bradley paid tribute to a former regent Ody Fish, who died last week but helped establish the first UW System admissions policy. Bradley said even in the late 1970s, Fish realized an admissions policy should be flexible to allow for diversity on all UW campuses and better prepare students for real-world encounters.
Education Committee Chair, Regent Danae Davis, said she appreciates being a member of this board because they have the courage to do the right thing.
"I couldn't be prouder of this board because in our quest to make clear what we are for, we resisted the temptation to make it easier for ourselves by taking race out the policy," Davis said.
With the board passing the new policy, Nass said he plans to ask state Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen for an opinion this week on whether the regents' policy conflicts with state law.
17 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Brother Ali makes an ‘Exclusive’ stop
Muckrakers
Report: Barrett to make decision by the end of the week
Extra Points
Top Classified Ads (view all)
HOUSES FOR Fall 2010. All houses are on W Dayton or N Bassett. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 bedrooms. All have parking. madisoncampusrentals.com





Maybe Madison should start segregating its classes too. What if the under-qualified minorities can’t keep up? Separate but equal classes.
Will the poor, under-represented males now be given extra consideration, so as to provide the sexual diversity now missing on campus?
I guess that separate and unequal has become legal once again. I wonder what the University will do when the white middle class starts refusing to identify their race on an application or puts down that they are multi-racial.
I would advise every applicant to claim that they are African-American and let the University try to determine that they are not.
“I guess that separate and unequal has become legal once again. I wonder what the University will do when the white middle class starts refusing to identify their race on an application or puts down that they are multi-racial.”
Yeah, poor white guys. It’s almost as if they’re 3/5ths of a real person.
“Maybe Madison should start segregating its classes too”
If Madison ever started segregating its classes by race all the students of color would get great jobs because they would be qualified and culturally competent to work in a diverse global economy, while the “white middle class” kids would end up jobless because of their inability to see that a diverse student body is in their own interst.
“Yeah, poor white guys. It’s almost as if they’re 3/5ths of a real person.”
The person who posted this is obviously ignorant, as this is something that does not pertain to the topic at all and is something that happened over a 100 years ago. I bet that person, doesn’t realize that there are far more poor, impoverished and under represented white people in america than there are african americans.- this is a fact, look it up. With that said, the policy of affirmative action is reverse discrimination, everyone knows that… the question is wheter or not we still need to “equalize” the playing fields… In my opinion, the faster its out of here the better, its something that has been around since the 60’s and it still isn’t working. We need to try something new, I suggest that instead of treating the symptoms which is what UW is now doing, we instead attack the cause of the problem which could start at the elemenatry level of educating- especially in the inner cities, and make undergraduate candidates qualified from the get go.
12:12, that was a pretty lame shot at wit. Until 1830, most states required that voters be white, protestant landowners. Women could not vote in federal elections until 1920. Until 1971, 18-20 year olds could not vote.
Everyone’s been oppressed at one time or another. Perhaps UW should consider an Irish Catholic quota.
“If Madison ever started segregating its classes by race all the students of color would get great jobs because they would be qualified and culturally competent to work in a diverse global economy…”
Because they’d only ever been in class with black people?
ROFLMAO
FTA: “Walsh also said he supports the policy because corporations want students who have experienced diversity so they are adequately prepared for the global workplace.”
The university is not a jobs training ground. That’s what trade schools are for. And globalism crushes individuality and creativity and personal responsibility. You can’t ‘experience’ diversity without those things.
I think it’s ironic that this debate paralells the debate about Iraq. Should we stay and help? Or, should we leave so they can help themselves?
It’s also strange that conservatives and liberals come to contradictory conclusions for Iraq and Affirmative Action.
I personally think UW lacks diversity. Specifically age diversity. Far too many of my classes have people in the high teens, low 20s. We need more infants and geriatrics. My education would greatly benefit learning cooperatively with incontinent classmates, as well as those who do their homework in crayons. There is valuable, wholistic learning to be done by spoon-feeding your lab partner. I think we are all missing valuable learning experiences by not having a more diverse age population.
What the board of regents doesn’t tell you is that the citizens of the state of Michigan passed a ballot proposal banning the use of race and gender as a factor into college admissions.
http://www.michigancivilrights.org/
I have yet to see an interview that has stressed the “diversity” of the other studnes in my classes. For some reason they tend to focus on actual job related skills.
Although many white Americans believe we are all equal, we are not. As a white person, one has more privelege and opportunity compared to a person of color despite thier socioeconomic status. For all of those who disagree with the board’s decision, you are all ignorant fools just like Senator Grothman who is a complete idiot. White people in this country have only succeeded because they have had the help of minorities, like the slaves manning thier plantations and the chinese laying the railroad tracks, etc. Even today, white people need minorites to clean thier bathrooms and cook thier food because they feel like they are superior. And colleges, espacially our own Madison, the flagship school of the UW system, needs more minorities to make itself more appealing to the global job market. So, as much as white people hate to admit it…you need us!
“like the slaves manning thier plantations and the chinese laying the railroad tracks”
BS, not in Wisconsin you idiot!
PS. Where’s my robot cleaning crew, and cook?
“I think it’s ironic that this debate paralells the debate about Iraq. Should we stay and help? Or, should we leave so they can help themselves?
It’s also strange that conservatives and liberals come to contradictory conclusions for Iraq and Affirmative Action.I think it’s ironic that this debate paralells the debate about Iraq. Should we stay and help? Or, should we leave so they can help themselves?
It’s also strange that conservatives and liberals come to contradictory conclusions for Iraq and Affirmative Action.”
What the Hell are you smoking and where can I get some?
This is the dumbest thing ever. Getting into an academic university should be SOLELY based upon academics and things relating to academics, not your race! Minorities should be treated the same way everyone else is and should have to abide by the same standards as the majority.
It is unfair that a middle class white kid who's worked hard to get good grades all his/her life may get denied because an average student got in because he/she had the “credential” of being a minority.
I’m a junior and I’ve tried for the last 2 years to get into a particular study group, but every year I was denied. This year, I checked the box that said African American, and guess what? I got in. I’m the only white guy in the group… I guess the same BS is going to apply for getting accepted to this university.