NEWS
Students deliver budget to Wiley
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Nick Penzenstadler:
- Cartoon attacks David Horowitz (May 6, 2008)
- Organization confident 'Sex Toys 101' will go on (May 1, 2008)
- Law School shuts down 'Sex Toys 101' talk (April 30, 2008)
- McCain drives economic line (April 17, 2008)
- McCain stopping in state today (April 16, 2008)
Related Stories:
- Tuition may rise following council's decision (March 15, 2007)
- ASM to revisit religious funding (April 17, 2006)
- Student leaders present Wiley with budget proposals (March 13, 2002)
- ASM increases original SSFC funds (January 30, 2004)
- Wiley to look over $27 million in budgets (March 3, 2006)
Share This:
by Nick Penzenstadler
Thursday, February 1, 2007
The Associated Students of Madison took another swing in their fight against University of Wisconsin System policy Wednesday night, with student government leaders claiming victory for students' rights.
ASM Student Council officially approved the budgets of all GSSF organizations that receive funding provided by student-segregated fees, which are paid by students in addition to tuition.
The approved budget includes funding for several student organizations' off-campus rent — a controversial decision that is in direct violation of UW System policy, which states that no segregated-fee funds can go toward paying rent at off-campus facilities.
Since student representatives began contesting the policy in November, a group of affected organizations came together to form the Student Rights Coalition to fight the policy.
Although the Student Services Finance Committee voted to reinsert the funding in question at its last meeting before winter break, Wednesday's meeting officially approved the budget and passed it on to Chancellor John Wiley.
Wiley will have to decide whether to approve the budget or send it back to ASM before it moves to the Board of Regents in May.
"This is a great first victory," SRC representative Rachel Butler said. "Now … the issue is about student rights, and we have the opportunity to fight for these rights with the regents."
However, Interim Dean of Students Lori Berquam said that even though she supported the students' voice throughout the process, Wiley would most likely be forced to strike the off-campus rent funding from the budget.
"The students have used their options, but if they are interested in the pursuing it with the regents I think they should do it," Berquam said.
However, according to Mike Dattner, treasurer for Collegians for a Constructive Tomorrow — a group with an off-campus office — whatever Wiley decides to do, the students will form their own draft of the budget.
Dattner added that Wednesday's decision shows the unity of the entire student body.
"First it was 'a few students' having a problem," Dattner said. "Now it's 'the students' having problem."
ASM Student Council Chair Dylan Rath said the student government would continue to support SRC as the budget progresses through the system this spring.
Although he is against the decision, Student Services Finance Committee Chair Zach Frey said the students' voice is clear.
"I still personally disagree," Frey said. "It's pretty clear what the students wanted to do however, so I hope [Wiley and the Regents] take that into consideration."
Race tensions flare at meeting
Directly on the heels of ongoing discussions about holistic admissions at UW, the ASM Student Council debated financial support for diversity programming at Wednesday's meeting.
Last week, SSFC voted to cut more than $30,000 from travel and diversity programs, and also dissolved five diversity specialist positions.
At Wednesday's meeting, the ASM Student Council replaced a majority of the funding after a heated debate.
"I'm tired of this campus and administration paying lip service to diversity issues if they aren't going to pay for it; it falls upon us to advocate for that," ASM representative Sree Atluru said. "We'd be taking everything ASM has fought for (for) 13 years and throwing it in the toilet."
ASM representative Steven Lawrence pointed out that "there's no extreme lack of funding" for the various diversity projects around campus.
Sharing her own personal experience, however, ASM representative Andreall Moore said she was "bamboozled" when she came to UW and was misled about the climate for minority students.
"Roughly 10 percent of students are students of color; let's applaud them for trying. But they've been trying and trying for years, and realistically, we don't do enough," Moore said. "We'll be known as Avoiding Students of Minority not Associated Students of Madison."
In SSFC's defense, Frey said it was never their intention to "silence minorities" when it cut the funding for the positions.
After a lengthy discussion ASM decided to reinstate the funds and approved the overall budget at $730,620.
Anonymous (February 1, 2007 @ 9:52am):
Heaven forbid any "diversity" programs have their budgets scrutinized...
Anonymous (February 1, 2007 @ 11:05am):
Dear Fellow Students,
Yes - we paid the segregated fees.
Yes - we get to have input on the budget
Yes - some of us can throw a temper tantrum
Ultimately, once we wrote a check to UW-Madison, that money became state dollars. We have a statutory right to "review and recommend" how to spend those dollars, but by sending this budget that violates policy, we've only lengthened an already long process to help fund our student groups.
"...whatever Wiley decides to do, the students will form their own draft of the budget." Good luck on that one, since you all have more access to the funds than the Chancellor.
Hopefully, we can keep the trantrum up long enough that no orgs get money next year, that would solve all our problems...
Anonymous (February 1, 2007 @ 11:20am):
Has anyone at the Herald ever bothered to actually go and read the seg fee policies, to see if there is actually a policy against funding off-campus rent? They're all up on the Web:
http://www.uwsa.edu/fadmin/fap.htm
http://www.uwsa.edu/bor/policies/
Anonymous (February 1, 2007 @ 1:50pm):
There simply is NO Regent policy, campus policy or Statutory language that prohibits the use of allocable segregated fees for off-campus, non-university leased buildings.
'nuff said.
Add a comment
We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.
Login...
Not registered? Sign up now.
It's quick, free, and the email address you provide will not be sold or solicited.
