News
Barrett goes for round two
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Beth Mueller:
- Grad ceremony students picked (April 10, 2009)
- Alcohol: Outside the law, inside the dorms (February 19, 2009)
- The Age of the Volunteer (January 22, 2009)
- Yes, he can? (January 20, 2009)
- University committee to see new leadership (December 1, 2008)
Sharing tools:
E-mail this article:
University of Wisconsin lecturer Kevin Barrett again used the UW campus as a platform to express his view that the U.S. government was behind the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks Thursday.
Barrett, for the second time this week, shared the stage with University of Minnesota-Duluth professor James Fetzer, a fellow member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth.
Thursday's event, held on the fifth floor of the Humanities building, was sponsored by UW's Undergraduate History Association.
UHA President Eli Persky said his intention in inviting Barrett and Fetzer to the meeting was to put them in a debate against UW political science and history professors. But the plan fell through, he said, because the other professors were unable to attend.
"We contacted more [professors] than we normally would have needed to," Persky said, guessing he had invited "more than half a dozen" faculty members.
"There were lots of previous engagements," UHA Vice President Sandra Brasda said.
In place of the planned debate, Barrett and Fetzer made a presentation and then accepted questions from students in an open discussion about their theory.
Throughout the two-hour appearance, Barrett and Fetzer reiterated their beliefs that the attacks of 9/11 were orchestrated by George W. Bush's administration as a means of furthering political goals, namely war in the Middle East.
Barrett's opening comments focused on the historical context for the group's claims, namely "false flags" throughout United States history, from the beginnings of the Spanish-American War through nearly every major U.S. military conflict since.
Barrett said throughout history, America has taken military action against weaker countries and then blamed the subsequent conflict on the weaker nation. Barrett added that is exactly what the United States is doing in today's conflicts with the Middle East. UHA members cited academic motivations for inviting the two controversial speakers, hoping to focus on the historical nature of the 9/11 attacks.
"We wanted to consider the topic," Persky said. "But we didn't want it to be biased. We didn't want to say it absolutely happened that way."
Barrett also commented on the psychological basis for the 9/11 attacks, focusing on what he perceives to be the technique of coercion employed by the government, similar to that employed by salespeople and interrogators.
"I think, psychologically, the way 9/11 worked was as a shock-and-awe operation," Barrett said. "The key is to shock people from their previous moorings."
Fetzer elaborated on the theories held by Scholars for 9/11 Truth, focusing especially on alleged contradictions to the laws of physics present in the government's official explanation of the attacks. He also claimed gross inaccuracies and inconsistencies throughout the 9/11 Commission Report.
4 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Top Classified Ads (view all)
HOUSES FOR Fall 2010. All houses are on W Dayton or N Bassett. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 bedrooms. All have parking. madisoncampusrentals.com
Does Eli Persky have a mandate to change his student group’s name to the Undergraduate Historical Revisionism Association? Because his agenda is entirely disigenuous and intellectually dishonest otherwise.
This Leftist propaganda campaign is akin to modern day Holocaust denial— and those giving voice to Professor Barrett’s deceptions ought to be ashamed.
Linking the 9/11 truth movement to “Holocaust Denial”?? Wow. You must be desperate. I can’t blame you, though. Every day another fact comes out pointing to 9/11 being an inside job. And another 10,000 people join in the movement to seek the truth about that day, which the 9/11 Ommission Report failed to properly investigate. What does the Commission say about the WTC-7 building’s mysterious collapse? Nothing. That’s a smoking gun. And you can’t do anything about it except link us to anti-semites? Pathetic.
YAWN. Maybe if we just ignore Barrett, the moron will go away.
My feelings are simply put. In the vernacular of a used car salesman - “There’s an ASS for every seat”.
This aptly applies to: Barrett (the epitome of an ass); as well as the university’s administration, who wishes to fill the lecturer’s chairs by selling a controversial product; and the very students filling those chairs.
Conversely, from the Cheech & Chong generation, (of which Barrett belongs): “If it looks like shit, smells like shit, feels like shit and tastes like shit, I’m sure glad I didn’t step in it”. Well now, you have the class syllabus.
I went to a very liberal school as well. A small, back-woods, snobbish, elite, private college in Berea, Ohio named Baldwin-Wallace College. As a matter of fact the founders were believers in communalism and many of my PoliSci profs professed the same - so by my being subjected to it, I know of what I speak.
This Barrett, he’s a cancer among us. Believe in him if you must - retain his tenure if you are afraid to let him go - but be aware that you’ll be incessantly vilified by your descendants for your academic promiscuity and undermining your student’s mental greatness that YOU once had an opportunity to promote!
Oh, no - DON’T thank me. Your sheer irritation is enough gratitude for me!