NEWS
Wisconsin Rapids to vote on Bush’s fate
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Courtney Johnson:
- Construction pops up on State Street this spring (November 6, 2007)
- Woods ahead in fundraising race (March 28, 2007)
- E-mail sparks privacy concern (October 9, 2007)
- Big Ten Network reaches deal with UW housing (August 31, 2007)
- City agency to run Halloween entertainment (May 10, 2007)
Related Stories:
- Wisconsin Rapids might place Bush impeachment on ballot (September 19, 2006)
- State approval for war declines (November 13, 2006)
- Madison says 'yes' to war initiative (April 5, 2006)
- ASM cancels elections, looks to reschedule (March 30, 2006)
- Commission cancels ASM elections again (April 6, 2006)
by Courtney Johnson
Thursday, September 21, 2006
The city of Wisconsin Rapids voted this week to put a referendum on the Nov. 7 general election ballot to determine whether President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney should be impeached. In a 7-1 vote Tuesday night, the Common Council voted to authorize placing the referendum on the ballot, along with other statewide elections for governor and attorney general.
Wisconsin Rapids citizen Bill Dolan introduced the referendum, which started as a 921-signature petition.
"Now the people have their chance to voice their opinion by voting," Dolan said. "We're very pleased with that."
Maynard Paterick, the president of the Wisconsin Rapids Common Council, said he is opposed to the idea of an impeachment referendum, going so far as to call it "ridiculous." In spite of that, however, Paterick voted to put it on the November ballot.
"I just don't think it should be brought up, but I felt I owed it to the [921] people to give them their rights," Paterick said.
The impeachment referendum may give this small northern Wisconsin town of about 18,000 a higher voter turnout.
"I may have to have more election workers, and we're already ordering more ballots because we expect more people," Vernon Borth, Wisconsin Rapids city clerk, said. "This, combined with the governor and sheriff's race, will probably make a bigger turnout."
According to Borth, 10 other important referendums will be on the city's ballot this year. And Dolan, meanwhile, said he is confident his referendum will pass.
"We couldn't reach everyone in the city, but the majority of them that we spoke to were for it," he said. Paterick disagreed with Dolan's assessment and said the resolution's vague wording and lack of specific reasoning will affect voter response.
"If they state they want the war ended in Iraq, it may be a different story, but that's not the way this referendum was made out," Paterick said. "I think it'll be defeated something terrible." In addition, Paterick said he and several other Common Council members were confused why a federal issue has become a city council issue.
Referendums similar to the one in Wisconsin Rapids will also be on ballots in Berkeley, Calif.; Champaign City, Ill.; Cunningham Township, Ill.; Pittsville, Wis.; and San Francisco.
"I think it'll show the [Bush] administration that the people are concerned enough to fight for this referendum on the ballot," Dolan said. "And hopefully it'll change their thinking."
Anonymous (September 21, 2006 @ 9:18am):
The headline is a little over the top, don't you think? Wisconsin Rapids is hardly deciding anyones fate. As the article even admits, this whole thing is a ploy to get more Dems to the polls and make some headlines to rip on Bush, which has become the entire platform for the Democratic Party. Sorry, maybe the media loves that, but being against everything isnt going to get you votes, and this whole thing may even backfire. You're in for a rude awakening in Nov.
