NEWS
Bill would limit access to public programs
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Ann Babe:
- Legislators introduce Jessica's Law (October 20, 2005)
- Parisi seeks prison releases (October 21, 2005)
- Study: attorney general race to be close (April 13, 2006)
- Senate override succeeds (January 27, 2006)
- Republicans criticize election reform (April 6, 2005)
Related Stories:
- Bill proposes extended emergency unemployment insurance (November 5, 2001)
- Assembly amends victims legislation (September 20, 2007)
- Proposed conscience-clause bill stirs up controversy (October 9, 2003)
- Increase in school choice cap makes way in legislature (February 23, 2006)
- Legislators push sick leave drafts (March 11, 2008)
Share This:
by Ann Babe
Friday, April 21, 2006
The debate over immigrant rights continued Thursday, as state lawmakers considered a bill that would prevent non-citizens from receiving public benefits like state-funded health care.
In a public hearing, members of the Assembly Judiciary Committee listened to testimony from speakers registered both in favor of and against the controversial bill.
Known as Senate Bill 567, the measure most notably helped spark protests at the Capitol earlier this month, as immigrant-rights advocates rallied against it and other anti-immigration bills.
While the rally's advocates charged SB 567 is discriminatory to immigrants, Thursday's bill opponents expressed different concerns regarding the bill's effect on non-immigrants.
"We think this bill could be the poster child for the law of unintended consequences," said Jon Peacock, research director for the Wisconsin Council on Children and Families, who testified against the bill at Thursday's public hearing.
Although the bill's aim is to prevent illegal immigrants from abusing state resources, its actual effect would be to unfairly deny legal citizens the public benefits to which they are entitled, Peacock added.
According to the bill's language, any person applying for state assistance programs must provide documentary proof of citizenship. Bill opponents charge this requirement would disproportionately affect the poor, elderly and cognitively disabled, who may have difficulty presenting documentation records.
But the bill's chief author, Sen. Tom Reynolds, R-West Allis, defended the measure as simply a more stringent version of a federal mandate set to go into effect in July.
"To some extent, they're going to have to deal with this either way," Reynolds spokesperson Patrick Henneger said. "It's probably a good thing that people may be forced to get [documentation]."
By delaying the bill, Henneger added, SB 567 opponents actually could be doing a disservice to Wisconsin citizens who will not be able to dodge documentation requirements in the future.
Committee member Rep. Robert Turner, D-Racine, however, said he is more concerned by the bill's immediate effects, adding it could lead to profiling and other forms of discrimination.
The state Department of Health and Family Services also testified against the bill, questioning its necessity.
"We have not seen the problem with ineligible people receiving benefits," DHFS legislative director Ron Hermes said, adding the department has concerns that the "unnecessary burdens" created by the bill would discourage people from applying for benefits.
But Rep. Terri McCormick, R-Appleton, disagreed and said the burden of paperwork does not qualify as a valid argument.
She and other bill supporters said the inconvenience would be worthwhile in the end, as it would save taxpayer dollars by ensuring only documented citizens receive state assistance.
"The inconvenience to obtain these documents is justified, considering the hundreds of billions of dollars that the state pays out in public benefits," Henneger said.
Critics, however, doubted Henneger's claims, calling them over-exaggerated and most likely outweighed by the tremendous administrative costs involved.
The measure must be passed by both the committee and the Assembly before it will go to the governor's desk for review.
As committee members continued to debate the merits of SB 567, they were more unified on another measure — voting to pass a bill that would classify alcohol as an intoxicant in rape cases.
The measure, SB 526, aims to add alcoholic beverages to the list of incapacitating substances already recognized for their impairing effects.
SB 526 is expected to be approved by the Assembly when the body reconvenes later this month.
Anonymous (May 3, 2006 @ 10:45pm):
Laws should have the aim to address social problems or make our society a better place. SB567 does neither and Ann Babe does nothing to investigate it. According to estimates from the US department of Labor, undocumented workers pay significantly more in taxes then they ever use in services. In real terms, undocumented workers are subsudizing the schools, Social Security retirement funds and health care of US citizens. In typical spiteful white male fashion John Reynolds and his Republican friends are further marginalizing the most powerless people in our society in the name of protecting his own "rights" and "priviledges". Ruth Babe simply repeats his blind and spiteful bullshit.
I would strongly urge all readers to look up the UN Declaration on the Rights of Children (A Treaty that the US is a signator). This bill aims to strip children of their rights to healthcare, education, protection, and identity.
Perhaps Reynolds can't hear the immigrant community screaming for their rights to be acknowledged as he is to busy applauding our fight for democracy and human rights in Iraq. Hey Ruth Babe, start questioning the hypocracy!
Aron Corbett
