News
Students react to being put on hold
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Joanna Pliner:
- Civil unions ban sparks protest (November 20, 2006)
- UW challenges crime wave (September 13, 2006)
- Ex-WiCell director starts anew (December 14, 2006)
- Former dean of students dies (October 2, 2006)
- Group parties in chancellor's office (October 18, 2006)
Sharing tools:
E-mail this article:
Cries of outrage slammed the Student Election Commission at a press conference Tuesday after the commission announced the abrupt cancellation of this week's Associated Students of Madison elections.
SEC Chair Tim Leonard said the technical system in which students vote online could not handle the "unprecedented" voter turnout and "high level of write-in candidates."
Additionally, some votes were counted more than once and some votes were not registered at all, he said.
"[I]n the interest of getting all students the chance to vote in a fair and error-proof election, we have decided to postpone the current election," Leonard told the audience.
Leonard's statement stirred a commotion among those present, which then increased when Leonard said all of the recorded votes have been "zeroed out."
According to Leonard, University of Wisconsin's DoIT could not investigate the problem without getting into the system, and the only way to do so was to shut down elections.
Jen Weaver, an ASM student organizer, said the online voting system experienced particular problems registering write-in votes. Many students received error messages when they tried to vote for a write-in candidate, and consequently voted for ballot-candidates they did not actually support, she added.
"We have never had this kind of voter turnout before, so we have never tested the system this way … this decision had to be made," Weaver said.
However, many of attendees of the conference disagreed.
Josh Healey, a member of Student Labor Action Coalition, demanded a student vote to cancel the election.
Immediately after his comment, other members of SLAC started "Bullshit!" chants — typically directed toward referees at Badger sporting events — in response to the cancellation by the elections commission
According to Healey, in "every election from the president down" there are "irregularities," but an election has never been stopped in the middle of the process.
"You allow [the votes] to be tallied, and then there is an appeal process…that's what happens," Healey said.
Representatives from SLAC, supporters of the Wisconsin Union Facilities Improvement Plan and ASM candidates present at the event expressed concern with stopping the elections with many saying the process neglected rules of democracy.
Some also questioned why the ASM Student Council was not notified of the cancellation prior to the press conference. Others accused the Student Elections Commission of having clandestine motives.
"It looks awfully shady," SLAC member Ashok Kumar said. "The election that is asking the most money out of students — the most important election [is cancelled] … by the power invested in Tim Leonard."
Joel Feingold, also a member of SLAC, displayed anger at the fact that ASM was not consulted before the votes were "zeroed out."
He alluded to the assumption that the elections commission shut down the voting process because there were too many people voting in support of the Union renovation and Living Wage referendums.
"So the problem was too much democracy and the solution is no democracy?" Feingold asked Leonard during the press conference.
But Leonard countered saying Feingold is "totally wrong," and defended the decision to stop the elections by describing the implications of the faulty voting system. He said he feels students should have full access to their "constitutional rights," including ASM election candidates.
"The [ASM] Constitution says that people are guaranteed cumulative voting — they weren't being guaranteed that," Leonard said. "The Constitution says that people are guaranteed write-in votes — they weren't being guaranteed that."
Additionally, Chief Justice of the Student Judiciary Nick Fox said thousands of students may have been "disenfranchised due to technical difficulties."
But for Vice Chair of SEC Josh Tyack, he predicted anger and fictitious rumors will emerge out of the election cancellation.
"I just hope people bear with us," he said.
8 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Brother Ali makes an ‘Exclusive’ stop
Muckrakers
Report: Barrett to make decision by the end of the week
Extra Points
Top Classified Ads (view all)
HOUSES FOR Fall 2010. All houses are on W Dayton or N Bassett. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 bedrooms. All have parking. madisoncampusrentals.com
SLAC is not the only group in this election! Why did the BH reporter not talk to anyone else? Jeez, talk about bias.
will SLAC ever grow up? i mean, who starts chanting bullshit toward someone at a meeting?
SLAC was an embarrassment to all student leaders at the press conference.
They don’t come to listen, they come to be angry. They come to lie and assume and then hold a rally about it.
SLAC was crass, disrespectful of the system [the very system they are relying on to get their political agenda passed] and disrespectful of everyone present at the press conference.
You’re outraged at SLAC? What, did SLAC unilaterally cancel an election without a vote of any governing body? Or were they the ones that wrote the crappy voting module code? Stop pussyfooting (Decorum!) around and answer!
Hey anonymous -
This is anonymous. It’s pretty obvious that you are one of the “insiders” everyone is talking about. The smart move here would be to apologize, repeatedly, even if it’s really DoIt’s fault. And get people trusting you again. They attack you? Apologize.
IT WAS NOT JUST SLAC! Individual candidates, their supporters, and supporters of the initiatives showed up to voice their anger at the system.
I like that you give them credit for those numbers, but it simply isn’t so. Only 9-10 slackers were there for most of the meeting.
But do you blame them, after incredible organizing to help turn out a record 6000 votes on the first day, only to have those votes thrown out?!?
Can’t you see what is really going on?
The inside hacks in and around ASM saw returns showing a massive defeat for their pet positions from which they and their patrons derive personal financial benefit. These measures include raising student fees $200/year on false fears of closing Memorial Union. They just want you to pay more for this largesse they squabble over each year because they are too lazy and inept to actually generate group income.
Can somebody please call the Carter Center? www.cartercenter.org
Hope the situation improves. I wonder if Leonard and CJ Fox really sought to sabotage the result, or to guarantee voters a cumulative ballot. According to WSJ, the referenda results will be upheld while the election of officials is postposned.