NEWS
Voters to determine pay
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Andriy Pazuniak:
- SSFC wittles Wunk Sheek budget (October 21, 2005)
- Cieslewicz, Judge come out on top in spring election (April 9, 2007)
- Music industry serves campus (March 22, 2007)
- UW to RIAA: No way (March 21, 2007)
Related Stories:
- Canceled ASM referendums back on ballot this fall (September 4, 2006)
- ASM cancels elections, looks to reschedule (March 30, 2006)
- ASM expects success in 4th attempt (October 16, 2006)
- Labor group to give thanks (November 20, 2006)
- ASM nullifies Wisconsin Union, living-wage votes (April 10, 2006)
by Andriy Pazuniak
Tuesday, March 28, 2006
Beginning today, students will have the opportunity to vote on two referendums that could drastically affect the look of the University of Wisconsin campus and the people who work on it.
This is the second in a two-part series addressing the referendums.
Student Labor Action Coalition members have continually expressed two goals for its Living Wage referendum.
Primarily, SLAC representatives said the referendum aims to raise the wages of University of Wisconsin employees earning less than a "living wage" and, secondly, to expand student-government power.
However, according to Vice Chancellor Darrell Bazzell and ASM Student Services Finance Committee Chair Rachelle Stone, the referendum, if approved, could do just the opposite.
Explicitly, the referendum would not allow ASM to allocate student segregated fee funding to "auxiliary budgets" — which includes the Wisconsin Unions, University Health Services and UW recreational sports — that do not pay workers a "living wage." A living wage is defined as a wage equal to or greater than 110 percent of the Federal Poverty Line.
In accordance with Wisconsin's state shared-governance laws, ASM has the authority to work in conjunction with the UW chancellor on deciding segregated-fee funding for various UW organizations.
The budgets are divided between "allocable budgets" — which include student organizations — and "auxiliary budgets" or "non-allocable budgets" — which include entities such as the Wisconsin Unions, University Health Services and UW recreational sports.
According to University of Wisconsin System Regent policy, representative student-government bodies, such as ASM, "shall have the responsibility for the disposition of 'allocable portions of … student fees'" and are "responsible for formulation of the allocable [segregated fees] budget."
However, questions about the role of student-government bodies regarding "non-allocable" budgets have been raised with the introduction of the living wage referendum.
The debate on the ultimate outcome of the referendum, should it be approved, centers on whether ASM has the authority to directly allocate funding for auxiliary budgets or merely make recommendations to the chancellor.
According to Vice Chancellor Darrell Bazzell, ASM can only play an advisory role in auxiliary budget funding decisions.
"Students have the right to advise the chancellor, but do not enjoy the right to approve or disapprove those budgets," Bazzell said in a March 23 interview.
Bazzell said then, and reaffirmed Monday, that should the living wage referendum pass, the student voice would be essentially removed from the segregated fee allocation process for auxiliary budgets.
By mandating that ASM can not approve funding for auxiliary budgets that do not pay workers a living wage, ASM would not be able to make a recommendation to the chancellor on how those budgets should be funded, Bazzell said. However, the chancellor would still be permitted to allocate funding to those budgets regardless of the provisions of the referendum, which applies only to ASM.
"My understanding of the provisions is that it would remove [ASM's] ability to advise," Bazzell said Monday.
Stone, chair of the ASM Student Services Finance Committee, which hears and amends organizations' segregated-fee budget proposals, agreed with Bazzell's assessment.
"The intention had been good, but cutting out a huge portion of the student process is problematic," Stone said. "The referendum could take some voice from the SSFC."
However, SLAC representative Joel Feingold and SLAC attorney Ben Manski, contend ASM does have the right to directly approve auxiliary budgets.
Both Feingold and Manski argued that a court has not yet resolved the issue and that if ASM were to be removed from the segregated-fee process, the university would be in violation of Wisconsin's shared-governance laws.
"It's actually the student body that drafts the budget for general student services," Manski said. "The chancellor has no role in that."
Feingold said the issue would have to be resolved by state courts if the UW administration attempted to block the referendum if it were approved.
Overall, though, Feingold said the primary goal of the referendum is to raise the wages of many UW employees.
"Right now, limited-term employees and students are working at a poverty wage," Feingold said. "And that's not enough to pay for basic needs in Madison."
All UW students have from 8 a.m. Tuesday to 8 p.m. Thursday to voice their support of or opposition to the referendum during an ASM online vote. Students can vote at http://vote.asm.wisc.edu.
Anonymous (March 28, 2006 @ 1:34am):
This policy itself cannot take power away from students, as Mac and the BH has invented and repeated since the last election. Only the Chancellor can do that, and if he chooses to do so, he needs to face the repercussions of taking away student control.
Students outside of SSFC in effect have little say directly into how their money is spent for most groups, but this initiative gives them the chance to stand up and say that they support fair wages for campus workers, and that their fees should not fund these abuses. This is what student fee autonomy is all about, this is what democracy looks like.
Anonymous (March 28, 2006 @ 9:53am):
How totally hypocritical of the brass on Bascom Hill.
Anonymous (March 28, 2006 @ 12:34pm):
Vote no on the living wages. We don't need them, these liberals think too much about others and it does no good.
Anonymous (March 28, 2006 @ 2:38pm):
Again, the Wisconsin Union and UW administrators have pushed onto a student online referendum a vote to fool students into increasing their own student fees $200 annually. It's a scheme to give them political cover for ultimately increasing it later this year.
They have even taken to coopting student organization websites to push this agenda for more money. See for yourself:
www.hoofers.org
Vote NO and send a message to the incompetent bureaucrats to make do with what they have, which is quite a lot already.
Anonymous (March 29, 2006 @ 1:53am):
you silly little person who posted about hoofers.org and the Union taking over student organizations.
The entire WUFIP process has been led by STUDENT leaders. Joshua Clemens from BASE and wisPIRG. Tristan Sather, Joe Yearm, Mike Schoenike and Elliot Weber from Hoofers. Shayna Hetzel, Janell Wise, Adam Robinson and other members of Directorate. Members of Polygon.
Maybe this is because it's a student project for students, by students.
PS: Hoofers is a club and also serves many community, faculty and staff members.
