News
Milwaukee ranks high on asthma list
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Kara Intrieri:
- Group hears public woes over transit (April 14, 2006)
- Forum urges HPV awareness for women (April 18, 2006)
- Lawmakers unveil TPA rival (April 20, 2006)
- State to debate tax protection bills (April 26, 2006)
- State ponders health care (May 4, 2006)
A national study recently ranked Milwaukee the fifth-worst city for people with asthma for 2006.
This study, conducted by the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America, considered 12 factors which were divided among prevalence, risk and medical categories. Public smoking bans in bars, restaurants and the workplace were one of the heaviest-weighted factors.
"Until Milwaukee passes those three [smoking] laws, they will stay high on the list because the whole country has made that move to ban smoking in public," AAFA spokesperson Angel Waldron said.
In addition to a lack of public smoking bans, Waldron cited other conditions — including high pollen levels and high death rates due to asthma — as contributing factors to cities earning the worst rankings.
Scranton, Penn., was ranked the worst city for people with asthma.
Madison, however, fared much better, ranking 13th-best of the worst 100 cities.
Many cite Madison's citywide public-smoking ban as a major factor in its higher air quality.
State Rep. Jason Fields, D-Milwaukee, agreed enacting smoking bans similar to those in Madison would improve Milwaukee's ranking in the future.
"I think a smoking ban will improve the conditions for asthmatics," Fields said.
Fields, an asthma sufferer himself, said he believes second-hand smoke severely worsens conditions for people with asthma.
"[A smoking ban] is definitely going to make [Milwaukee] a conducive place for us to breathe and live," he added.
Plans are currently in the works to enact a smoking ban in Milwaukee.
Milwaukee received an "F" in air quality based on the national average, showing that public-smoking laws are only part of the reason for the high asthma ranking.
In addition to environmental factors, social and natural causes contribute to Milwaukee's poor asthma conditions.
According to Dr. John Meurer, medical director of Downtown Health Center in Milwaukee, the prevalence of asthma among African-Americans is higher than those from white backgrounds.
The burden of suffering is therefore increased due to the higher population of African-Americans in Milwaukee, Meurer added.
"The poverty rate of African-Americans [in Milwaukee] is highest of the 30 largest cities in the U.S.," he said. "This affects the access to medical care."
Meurer also pointed out that the best asthma specialists are located in the suburbs of Milwaukee, making it less accessible to asthmatics living in the city.
Additionally, Milwaukee's high levels of ragweed in the fall contributed to the high ranking because asthmatics have more trouble with high pollen levels.
While poor environmental factors are proven to increase problems for asthmatics, Meurer stressed the importance of public-health awareness in dealing with asthma.
According to Meurer, an individual can counter poor environmental conditions by avoiding tobacco smoke, taking appropriate medication and avoiding environmental triggers such as allergens.
Fields also emphasized the fact that asthmatics can control their health despite living in a city with poor conditions, but acknowledged the difficulties.
"When you're not in shape or surrounded by polluted areas or you don't know how to manage your health, it will be tough," Fields said.
Despite the study's negative findings, Fields is hopeful for the future.
"I believe conditions in Milwaukee are exactly where we want to be headed," he said.
2 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Brother Ali makes an ‘Exclusive’ stop
Muckrakers
Report: Barrett to make decision by the end of the week
Extra Points
Top Classified Ads (view all)
HOUSES FOR Fall 2010. All houses are on W Dayton or N Bassett. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 bedrooms. All have parking. madisoncampusrentals.com





If the public was honestly and truthfully informed about the effects of second-hand smoke, there would be fewer no-smoking laws in this country. A little smoke from a handful of crushed leaves and some paper that is mixed with the air of a decently ventilated venue is going to harm or kill you?
If anyone believes that, then I have a bridge I would like to sell them.
There has never been a single study showing that exposure to the low levels of smoke found in bars and restaurants with decent modern ventilation and filtration systems kills or harms anyone.
As to the annoyance of smoking, a compromise between smokers and non-smokers can be reached, through setting a quality standard and the use of modern ventilation technology.
Air ventilation can easily create a comfortable environment that removes not just passive smoke, but also and especially the potentially serious contaminants that are independent from smoking.
I’m sorry Mr. Laprade, but your comments are wrong. In fact, if you conduct a literature search on pubmed, scholar.google.com, or any other scientific search engine, you will discover many articles published on the danger of secondhand smoke. In addition to casuing and/or exacerbating lung problems, it is shown to increase the likelihood of heart problems and heart attacks. Please do your research before spouting off your personal views.