NEWS
Animal proteins taint stem cells
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Rachel Patzer:
- Government group announces research guidelines (April 27, 2005)
- JFC scales back Doyle's hunting, fishing license fees (April 28, 2005)
- High court hears cap arguments (April 28, 2005)
- Green to run for governor (May 2, 2005)
- Senate greenlights 2nd student regent (May 4, 2005)
Related Stories:
- New stem-cell line approved (October 2, 2001)
- UW scientists eliminate stem cell barrier (February 18, 2005)
- Researchers obtain stem cells from unfertilized embryo (September 29, 2003)
- UW researchers create brain cells from stem cells (December 2, 2001)
- First in series of speeches raises stem-cell issues (February 5, 2002)
by Rachel Patzer
Wednesday, January 26, 2005
All federally approved human embryonic stem-cell lines currently available are suspected to be contaminated with an animal molecule, suggesting stem-cell use in medical applications could be unsafe.
The use of mice “feeder” cells in laboratory culture is the typical method for growing stem cells. Since the first stem-cell lines were created, researchers have hypothesized a possible contamination from animal proteins.
“It was predicted there would be these kinds of issues,” said University of Wisconsin director of research communications Terry Devitt. “When you mix human cells with animal cells, there’s always a risk. These cell lines were never developed with the intention of [clinical use].”
The contaminated cell lines are still perfectly usable for research — as they have been since the beginning — and are still “incredibly valuable” cells for research, according to Devitt.
University of California researchers confirmed what scientists have predicted when they found their stem cells were contaminated with a substantial amount of mice protein, called N-glycolylneuraminic acid, or Neu5Gc for short. Their experimental results appeared Jan. 23 in the journal Nature Medicine.
Stem cells contaminated with Neu5Gc are a potential problem because humans could mount an immune response to the cells, making medical therapy very difficult.
“We have found that humans are making antibodies against Neu5Gc, presumably due to our exposure to this non-human molecule in dietary sources such as red meat and dairy products,” leader of the research team Dr. Ajit Varki said in an e-mail. “Thus, we predict that if [stem cells] or their derivatives grown under the current conditions were put into living humans, there is a significant chance of a deleterious immune reaction and/or rejection of the transplanted cells.”
UW professor of medical ethics Alto Charo said this is not new information but just provides a confirmation of researchers’ hypotheses concerning the stem-cell lines. Everyone knew the older lines, including UW’s, grew on mouse-feeder cells and could potentially not be useful for clinical research in the future, Charo said.
“In the future, we will be hoping to use [clean] cell lines to grow tissues for transplantation in humans,” Charo said.
Currently, federal funding is not available for the production of any new cell lines. The controversial decision by the Bush administration in 2001 restricting funding has some scientists worrying whether the potential applications of their own research will be affected.
UW professor of anatomy and neurology Su-Chun Zhang studies the applications of stem cells in neurology. Zhang said it would take much effort to start new cell lines, especially because of the federal restrictions.
“I’m not sure if people have the technique [to make clean cell lines] yet,” Zhang said. “Several groups [of researchers] are trying to establish ways to grow [stem cells] in a chemically defined environment without a need for feeder cells to support stem-cell growth, so then we wouldn’t have to deal with [contaminated stem cells].”
Anonymous (January 26, 2005 @ 8:47am):
We knew they were contaminated all along. They are absolutely useless for human trials. If federal funding is not restored to find ways to make clean cells, it would be like flushing a marvelous piece of science down the toilet...
Bob Maple (January 26, 2005 @ 5:42pm):
I don't get why some enterprising scientist doesn't just knock up his 13-year-old daughter and scoop out the embryo. If he's really enterprising, he can trick her into having lots of sleep-overs with her friends, drug them, and scoop out the embryos that way.
It's not like murder and thuggery haven't been committed before in the name of liberalism and science. Ted Kennedy himself murdered his girlfriend when she became burdened with an inconvenient lump of embryonic genetic material and he's revered as a hero by the Marxist elite. I'm sure if there had been a need for human embryos back then to create some sort of Master Race, he would have sold her to some black budget lab somewhere in a heartbeat, and then sent out an email to all his supporters.
If there is no God, what is preventing this? Surly not some sentimental and unscientific attachment to one's own flesh and blood? Surely not some false and imaginary ideal of morality which, if it doesn't come from some power higher other then human, is merely an arbitrary contrivance. If you'd scoop it out of someone else's daughter, why not your own? Lead by example, for Stalin's sake! Kinsey did!
This is, after all, the generation of the Thug and Slut as seen on MTV so what's the hang-up? Just put on a Snoop Thuggy Thug or Christine Askankaulaara CD, call her a ho, and inseminate. What are children, after all, if not the genetic materials of their parents? Who has more right then one of the High Priests of our age?
If anyone complains, just call them "redneck," "fundie," "Jesusboy/girl" etc. and poison the water supply with LSD, they'll come around. Let nothing impede the march of scientism! We are Progressive Danes, are we not? Forward!
