NEWS
Politicos debate electoral platforms
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by John Potratz:
- UW enacts new parental notification policy for students (September 22, 2005)
- Group petitions for financial support (October 12, 2005)
- Isreali speaker lauds business (October 26, 2005)
- Unions remain top priority (April 13, 2005)
- Spanish visas return (November 11, 2005)
Related Stories:
- Sellery collects students clothes (March 3, 2008)
- Collegiate partisans tackle topics of day (October 20, 2004)
- College Republicans set for political semester (September 13, 2006)
- Officials expecting low turnout in Supreme Court, Dane County Board elections today (April 1, 2008)
- Debate continues over new dorm (April 27, 2004)
Share This:
by John Potratz
Thursday, September 23, 2004
University of Wisconsin students of all political backgrounds came together last night in Sellery residence hall to eat cookies, sip lemonade and debate some of today’s most pertinent issues.
The Wisconsin Student Public Interest Research Group hosted the College Democrats, Republicans, Greens and Students for Nader for a casual debate aimed to provide students with an unfiltered glimpse into each party’s positions.
Nearly 50 students gathered while members from each political organization answered questions from both WISPIRG and the audience.
After a short discussion on state issues such as gay marriage, tuition and the No Child Left Behind Act, the debate focused on the headlining issue of Iraq.
Frank Harris, the former chair of the College Republicans, defended the war stating, “We didn’t go into Iraq to conquer but to liberate, we brought democracy to people who have never had it and are giving them the same liberties that we have [in America].”
While admitting the United Nations has a role to play in Iraq, Harris said, “We don’t need the U.N. to give us a slip to go to war.”
College Democrat Chair Liz Sanger cited U.N. support as the solution to the conflict.
“We need to form an international alliance with all of our traditional allies. We don’t just rush into something without consulting other nations,” Sanger said. “The [U.N.] is a wonderful organization and a great forum for all countries to come together and make decisions.”
She added John Kerry “trusts” the United Nations and hopes to rebuild international alliances.
Harris defended President Bush’s lack of international involvement, claiming that major allies such as Russia and France have isolated themselves from the conflict due to oil contracts they hold with Iraq.
“War sucks, but it’s a reality,” Harris added.
College Greens and Students for Nader disagreed with both parties’ war agendas. Representatives from both parties said that Green party candidate David Cobb and Independent Ralph Nader have plans to remove all troops from Iraq within the next six months.
After a short break for more cookies, the debaters touched on topics like gay marriage, education and health care.
While most students came with a predetermined party affiliation, some, like UW sophomore Michelle Jordan, came to get an idea of what this year’s election is all about.
“This election is my first time voting and I feel very uninformed. I came to get a better idea of what each party is about,” she said.
Jordan left the debate feeling optimistic and better informed.
“I think a structured debate is good to represent people’s opinions,” she said.
UW student Tim Van Doren said he would study each candidate more before the election.
“There are not enough facts, all I hear are plans,” he said. “It is motivating me to look into each candidate more.”
Anonymous (September 23, 2004 @ 6:53pm):
Republicans love to call John Kerry a flip-flopper, especially in regards to his position on the war in Iraq. What's amusing is that the war was sold to Americans on the basis of fear of Iraq's weapons as a threat to our safety because the Bush administration was smart enough to know that it would never garner enough support for a war that was just to spread democracy. Yet the new GOP mantra in regards to Iraq is the spread of democracy and supposed liberation of the Iraqi people with no mention of that pesky WMD issue.
Anonymous (October 28, 2004 @ 1:18pm):
I thought it was hert warming
