ArtsEtc.: Hump Day

Why is Hump Day no longer about sex, columnist answers

Because humpday@badgerherald is lacking fresh questions this week, I decided to pull a suggestion from the anonymous online comment boards instead:

This is a sorry excuse for a sex column…. If I don’t have a boner by the time I am done reading the hump day section, then you as a writer have failed. How about an article on the “upper-decker blumpkin AC Slater” and other similar acts?

If anyone would like to find out what the sexual act mentioned above entails, please check urbandictionary.com. This column isn’t a junior high locker room.

And maybe that’s exactly what needs to be reiterated. A college sex advice column is not a letter from Penthouse magazine. Discussing complicated sexual issues will probably not give you a boner every time. Watch porn instead — way more effective.

Our job, rather, is to promote healthy sexual activity around campus and to address the concerns of those who are trying to navigate the open waters of sexuality. Saying the articles are worthless because they are not explicitly pornographic narratives not only is ignorant, but also is insulting. It insinuates the sole purpose of Hump Day is to give an erection to guys who enjoy giggling about the combination of fellatio and feces.

False.

Instead, I want to bring up a very fresh approach to sex in general. I had the pleasure of seeing Jessica Valenti, editor of Feminisiting.com, speak for PAVE during Sexual Assault Awareness Month. She recently wrote a book called “Yes Means Yes!: Visions of Female Sexual Power and a World Without Rape.” In it, Thomas Macaulay Millar’s essay, “Toward a Performance Model of Sex”, outlines a new way to consider fucking that blows our current “commodity” model out of the water. In lieu of considering feminine sexuality (or bluntly, pussy) something that men wish to purchase, steal or get their grubby hands on in any way possible, the performance model outlines one simple theory: we are all musicians. Each of us has a unique sexual instrument. We can get together with other musicians and have a jam session, and from that we can make some very sweet music.

Millar’s model is awesome in several contexts. First of all, it breaks up that stubborn gender binary. What if pussy’s not involved in the scenario, or what if only women are involved in the commodity model? The model does not work for anything other than hetero-normative exchanges. It also puts a price on women’s sexuality; her “worth” is based on supply and demand. And about men being ruthless animals who just want to possess women: yeah, that’s a pretty shitty stereotype for them too. Everybody loses.

In the performance model, sexual exploration is encouraged. This breaks with society’s conventional virginity fetish; no one wants to jam with someone who hasn’t ever touched their instrument. I never improved in playing my non-metaphorical clarinet because I never practiced; in Millar’s model, it’s all about practice, practice, practice. Is one learning method not working for you? There are plenty of schools of thought in getting the sweetest sound from your own instrument. When you play with someone else, neither party “loses part of herself”; you can only get better with rehearsal!

Being a true virtuoso means being familiar with many different musical styles. Some might like to play gritty blues while others stick to Romantic classical arrangements. You can teach your partners a new style they aren’t familiar with, and instead of expecting them to be perfect at it from the start, it’s reasonable to allow them some time to learn the music.

No one would (openly) disagree with the statement that rape is completely awful. However, if you put it in the context of the commodity model, it almost seems par for the course. Women have this valued good, men want it and the most efficient thing to do is just to take it. Vile, yet true. But how fun is it to jam with someone who isn’t playing along with you? If someone stays silent, a solo session would definitely be preferred. The performance model exemplifies the idea that consent should not just be an absence of “no,” but instead a resounding and enthusiastic “YES!”

Metaphors aside, wouldn’t you only want to have sex with people who are completely into it? Guys, to be clear: If someone isn’t enthusiastic about having sex with you, don’t try to have sex. There is a point when you or the other person has had too much to drink to communicate effectively, and even if she wants to shout “no” she might not have the capacity. Your partner didn’t “ask for it.” You assaulted her. We need to come together as a campus and recognize this gigantic problem and start empowering women AND men to speak up

The rape culture (the get-her-drunk-and-fuck-her mentality) glamorizes the commodity model; I’d say it’s about time we all took a stand against such an ugly structure. Why not get together and make some beautiful music instead?

Nikki Signer is a political science and religious studies major and a facilitator for Spill. Jessica Valenti and Thomas Macaulay Millar have been cited without official permission. PAVE and affiliates do not necessarily endorse these views. Send some fresh sexual meat to [email protected]

9 Comments | Leave a comment

user-pic

I really appreciate your flexible and fresh approach to sexuality. Strict ideas of what is “normal” and “good” just don’t always work for everyone, plain and simple.

We do all agree on one thing that ISN’T flexible, though, and that’s the requirement of a “yes” out of all parties before engaging in any sexual activity.

Getting people drunk so they’ll sleep with you is just not okay, ever. If someone won’t sleep with you sober, don’t keep trying when more alcohol is a factor.

Having sex like that doesn’t make you a stud, it makes you a rapist, a criminal and someone who just destroyed the life of another person in the name of getting laid. Thanks for bringing this up. Something like this should be common sense and a matter of basic decency, but somehow it still happens all the time.

user-pic

You try to take the high road, and present these absurd ideals of what hump day “is,” and then you use the words “fucking” and “pussy.” If you want people to expect more intelligent discussion about sex, write more intelligently.

This column is absolute shit. People want to read about SEX damnit. It doesn’t have to give every guy a boner when they read it, but it should be clearly about sex.

Also, it’s strange that a metaphor about preventing rape also involves ridiculous amounts of casual sex. If you practice with your instrument as much as you should with that of a musical variety, you’ll have a lot more to worry about than rape.

Another thing, “Jessica Valenti and Thomas Macaulay Millar have been cited without official permission?” What the hell is that supposed to mean? You don’t need to ask permission to CITE something if it’s publicly available like a lecture or a book. You just do it. Citing is a means to show where the work came from, if they said it or wrote it for public consumption, they expect people to hear and read it.

And I would hope PAVE doesn’t endorse your theory that people should “fuck” as much as they would practice a musical instrument or play in random “jam sessions.”

Get a clue. People want to read about stuff that applies to them, like relationship-related sexual advice. This isn’t the rape prevention column, it’s HUMP DAY

user-pic

“You try to take the high road, and present these absurd ideals of what hump day �is,� and then you use the words �fucking� and �pussy.� If you want people to expect more intelligent discussion about sex, write more intelligently.”

Why think that using “fucking” and “pussy” is evidence that someone is unintelligent? Throwing a good “fucking” into a sentence can be damn effective in making a point sometimes, even if you have a large vocabulary. Think about it: what’s more effective, telling someone to leave you alone, or to fuck off? (See Pinker 2007 for a lengthy discussion of this.)

“Also, it�s strange that a metaphor about preventing rape also involves ridiculous amounts of casual sex. If you practice with your instrument as much as you should with that of a musical variety, you�ll have a lot more to worry about than rape.”

If the “casual sex” is with people you trust, and you take appropriate precautions, then this is just false.

“And I would hope PAVE doesn�t endorse your theory that people should �fuck� as much as they would practice a musical instrument or play in random �jam sessions.�”

Why not? I’m not affiliated with PAVE, but from what I can tell from their website, they’re concerned with preventing violence, not with stopping sex between consensual adults who aren’t taking advantage of one another.

It’s funny, you say that you want a column about sex, but seem to have a pretty Puritanical view of the whole thing (and a ridiculously elitist view of language, to boot).

user-pic

i stopped reading after feminism

user-pic

I think that Nikki has missed the point. Where is the humor? Where is the fun? What happened to the awesomeness of Hump Days of years past? The good old days where one could open up a Badger Herald and read about the juicy details of autofellatio? This hasn’t been an enjoyable column all year. Please reconsider the old format. Q&A sucks.

user-pic

Is the “upper-decker blumpkin AC slater” not a new style? Would it not be an incredibly syncopated and harmonized melody? It would probably even be more elegant than your forced transition from “fellatio and feces” to your alleged “fresh [sic] approach to sex.” Yes, rape is a horrible and disgusting criminal act and rapists should be (and are) sent to prison for a long time. We get it. Since when did the hump day column become a medium for the feminist movement? I hate to be the bearer of bad news (no I don’t), but the hump day column is read almost exclusively for hopes of a having a nice break in the day and, believe it or not, a “giggle.”

user-pic

The awesomeness of Hump Days gone past now writes a sex column for the Daily Cardinal.

user-pic

I appreciate this article and think it’s awesome that you interpret this column to your own liking! Thank you for taking a stand.

user-pic

I don’t want to be redundant and quote the author, but seriously, if you’re looking for a boner go watch some porn. It’s a great thing. Why is it that everyone gets all up in arms when she tries to discuss a serious issue and/or help someone with a question about sex? Are you all honestly that upset with a small change in your world? Trust me, there are plenty of other sources of raunchy information about sex, at least this posed some interesting viewpoints.

Leave a comment

To comment anonymously or if signed in, leave name and e-mail blank.

Donate