Long-awaited Axl album overblown
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Jason Smathers:
by Jason Smathers
Monday, November 24, 2008 00:00
Even though several friends listen to Appetite for Destruction as if it was the pinnacle of ’80s rock, I can’t help but start laughing whenever Axl Rose reached one of his classic falsetto yelps. Maybe it’s just because the idea of that rock ‘n’ roll mating call being a classic part of the music as a little silly, or maybe it’s because when Rose tried his signature siren at the MTV Video Music Awards a few years back, it sounded unhinged and closer to an animal’s death rattle than vocal virtuosity.
But then again, I doubted many looked at Guns N’ Roses — at least, in its present form — as anything respectable in the least. It’s been 17 years since the group released Use Your Illusion and their fans — and just curious onlookers — have been wondering what would become of their rather ominously titled Chinese Democracy.
Well, it’s here. But now I’m confused by what everyone expected. Or at least those who seem to balance American culture on their own literary scales.
OK, so I’m talking about Chuck Klosterman. He seems to exist on a different plane of existence with his praise for Chinese Democracy. He’s got some good points on the album, which, if evaluated in a vacuum, is actually pretty decent. He notes how ridiculous some of Axl’s production tricks are and the infusion of nearly every musical technique he knows, and how many of the times what he thinks he’s doing and what he actually ends up doing are separated by a gaping hole as large as Rose’s ego.
But Klosterman, who loves to muse and riff just a hair too far, seemed to overstate the importance of Chinese Democracy. Chuck gives Guns N’ Roses the wonderful privilege of having the “last album that will be marketed as a collection of autonomous-but-connected songs, the last album that will be absorbed as a static manifestation of who the band supposedly is, and the last album that will matter more as a physical object than as an Internet sound file.”
Just because the album is called Chinese Democracy, that doesn’t give one license to overstate its grandeur or impact. First off, albums are still, despite the ability to unbundle them with makeshift iTunes singles, marketed as a collection of songs. Concept albums might become more prevalent as the art form has to prove itself, but singles-only production lost its luster a long time ago and won’t be coming back anytime soon. Second, as much I would love to imagine a solid lineup for Guns N’ Roses, this album credited 14 studios, spanned 15 years and still has remnants of ex-drummers and guitarist “Buckethead.” Static it ain’t. This is just the collective workings of one controlling, spindly one-time hair metal (now cornrow-laden) hero.
But Klosterman’s right — this album is more important than the MP3’s or ACC’s most people will take in.
And that’s what disappoints me. Chinese Democracy is a great glam rock album. In fact, it may be the pinnacle of achievement that proves once and for all why Guns N’ Roses were worth more than all the Poison’s and Motley Crue’s put together.
But also know that American musical tastes since the 1980’s have survived on the three R’s — re-listen, review, revise. When the turn of the century came, a slew of young acts came out of the gate aping classic rock formulas, to which the media claimed “retro is in!”
Wolfmother revived Led Zeppelin. And Jet ripped off Iggy Pop and ’70s rock. And everybody generally did what their idols were doing 20 to 30 years ago. Never did I think there would be an act that would try and mimic Hall & Oates, but after seeing Baby Teeth last year at High Noon Saloon, I stood corrected.
But I think we can all agree: There is no need for a hair metal revival. Power ballads aside, the stadium-sized, over-the-top, coke-induced, Behind-the-Music, faux-masculine androgynous rock that reached its most respectable musical accolades with Van Halen — and it’s most absurd with tribute bands to Whitesnake — died with Nirvana. Ashes to ashes.
However, Klosterman’s nostalgia and cultural cache — combined with the fact that Chinese Democracy actually does rock — could not only spark interest in that anomaly of artistic expression but also encourage others to recreate the genre in their vision. After all, if Axl Rose spent 15 years on album and actually made something that could be described as “literary” by one of the top cultural critics of our time, maybe there can be depth to the excesses of rock.
For those under this delusion: Listen to “Cherry Pie.” If this is the most elaborate extended metaphor a musical genre can come up with, there aren’t exactly leagues of meaning to explore.
So please, to all you nostalgic culture mavens out there, celebrate Chinese Democracy if you must, but don’t take it as a call to arms.
Jason Smathers is a senior majoring in history and journalism. Does Axl Rose inspire you to play guitar with your teeth and ware skin-tight leather pants? Let him know at jsmathers@badgerherald.com.
Feedback
Anonymous (November 24, 2008 @ 7:28am):
"Even though several friends listen to Appetite for Destruction as if it was the pinnacle of ’80s rock, I can’t help but start laughing whenever Axl Rose reached one of his classic falsetto yelps."
Your comments are therefore instantly irrelevant.
Anonymous (November 24, 2008 @ 9:03am):
"But I think we can all agree: There is no need for a hair metal revival."
I don't disagree, I guess, but I also wouldn't really care if one occurred.
Anonymous (November 24, 2008 @ 9:37am):
Axl's falsetto yelps are the epitome of 80's rock and roll, they are part of what made gnr great. And by the way, Appetite for Destruction is the high point of 80s rock. It has sold almost 30 million albums, and is the highest selling debut album by any band ever!!! Sure, gn'r isn't what it used to be but don't knock on them when they were the best band in the world. Also, hair metal is having a revival. Motley Crue also released an album this year, "Saints of Los Angeles," that has sold very well. Also, you're using "Cherry Pie" as an example of hair metal. Please. If you knew anything about hair metal, you would know that Warrant was a second-class band, nothing compared to gnr, motley crue, skid row, or van halen.
Anonymous (November 24, 2008 @ 10:50am):
Interesting article, and I agree there's no need for a hair metal revival. But GNR was not a hair metal band and are not one now. After Cobain died, there was a rewriting of music history that said that Nirvana came and made all those LA hair bands obsolete and b/c Rose was already in hiding at the time, people lumped GNR in there.
But the fact is that GNR, with their sex pistols meets aerosmith sound, had shamed those other LA bands long prior to Nirvana. They may have looked like a hair metal band (especially in hindsight), but they didn't sound or act like one.
I tend to agree with Klosterman that this is the last Big Rock Album, in that its a throwback to Led Zep in the 1970s, when individual albums were scrutinized and liner notes carefully analyzed much beyond their actual worth. And with Rose being such a recluse all people will have is this album to analyze as its unlikely he'll ever explain its meaning.
Anyway, that said, Chinese Democracy is a great album, one that I have no problem placing next to Los Campesinos! and Plants and Animals as my favourite CD of the year without hurting my indie cred. Cheers, nice article.
Anonymous (November 24, 2008 @ 1:02pm):
Agreed with the above. People gave Nirvana all the credit for killing hair metal, mostly because GNR went dormant and Cobain feuded with the band. But GNR was dropped the hair metal label early on. They did indeed shame the rest of the genre. The new CD, btw, has less filler than Illusions and is pretty much on par with them musically. A few tracks are overproduced but the songs are there.
Anonymous (November 24, 2008 @ 4:00pm):
When were Guns N Roses a hair metal or glam band? Were you even alive in the 80's or did you just read about them?
Anonymous (November 24, 2008 @ 5:40pm):
a few reasons why a senior majoring in history and journalism is not to be taken seriously :
1. He hasn't sold 30 million+ albums
2. He cannot even dream of selling 30 million+ albums
3. Does not seem to understand the fact that appetite for destruction is one of the highest selling albums ever.
4. Has clearly not heard of the terms Progressive or avant guard
5. Is not open to musicians exploring other genres or stlyes and thus, is also likely to not to have any regard for highly respected names like david bowie and thom yorke.
6. oh! and someone who, while writing about chinese democracy, starts talking about hair metal...Wow...
dude...here's a pointer...axl rose is a musician first and maybe then a rockstar or whatever...so he gets to choose the music that he makes..and nobody else..
and
unlike the rest of the albums that have come out of the gnr stable, chinese democracy is symbolic of Rose's versatility and not of his quest for finding "that perfect sound".
also,
If Guns n Roses were glam, then i really don't know what ziggy stardust was...??
and as for his MTV Video Music Awards performance...well...that was not "the only" performance in all these years you know..
Anonymous (November 25, 2008 @ 1:11am):
It always amuses me how these so-called "experts" have a tendancy to lump every band that came up in the 80's with a hard rock sound as "hair metal". The simple fact that this so-called "journalist" or "critic" does this here, renders everything he says as irrelevant. Actually, that's too kind a word...Ridiculous is more like it. The guy should do his homework.
Guns N' Roses was anything but a "hair metal band". They were a punk rock/blues based rock n' roll hybrid which later became a polished rock band that, despite losing some of their grit, defined an era of hard rock music that was cut short because of the saturation from all of the pretenders that followed. Firehouse, Saigon Kick, Britney Fox, Warrant, Poison, and many others of their ilk were "hair metal", but there were just as many great bands that were real musicians that just happened to arrive in the "glam rock/hair metal 80's" that actually could play their instruments and were legitimate Rock N' Roll bands. And Guns bested them all. It's just a shame that narrow minded, revisionist history buffoons such as this guy dismiss an entire era and musical genre on the basis of a few bad apples that fell to the ground, instead of the gorgeous tree that begat them.
The simple truth is, this guy, just like most of his contemporaries, "cannot see the forrest for the trees". Nor can he likely be reasoned with. He's just another in a long line of people who unfortunately "believe the (bad) hype". Those people missed out on a lot of great music, created by a lot of great bands because they were/are too ignorant to actually check out the music that was made based on their own preconceived prejudice. How completely sad.
Long Live Rock N' Roll.
Dean Mills
MVPVDO@aol.com
Anonymous (December 10, 2008 @ 2:39am):
hey dork who wrote the article, that Jet riff is pretty common and Iggy Pop wasn't the first to use it, do your research u hack,
use your ilusions was great all the way through
u don't even know what band fits into what genre, u should be fired
Nirvana was awful, just really bad alternative cash cow
Add a comment
We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.
Login...
Not registered? Sign up now.
It's quick, free, and the email address you provide will not be sold or solicited.
...or Post Your Comment Anonymously
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Muckrakers
The Passion of C-FACT, or ‘What Happens When You Lose Your Papers’
Extra Points
Football recruiting: Two under-the-radar prospects commit
Simply Sumptuous
Development Weblog
Top Classified Ads (view all)
Place your classified ad online and have it show up here. Your ad will hit thousands of viewers a day!
DON'T READ ME! Too late. If you're reading this, guess how many other people are reading it. See... advertising in The Badger Herald does work!


