The Badger Herald

ARTSETC.

Panic’s newest less ‘Odd’

Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.

Also by Holly Robertson:

Jack is back with island melodies (February 5, 2008)
Dashboard's sweet nothings (October 2, 2007)
Motion City's sound evolving (September 20, 2007)

by Holly Robertson

Thursday, March 27, 2008

Straying far from the eccentric, lyrically jammed sound developed on A Fever You Can’t Sweat Out, Panic at the Disco releases a brighter sophomore album titled Pretty. Odd. After retiring the exclamation point, collapsing the freakish circus tent, ditching a completed first attempt and disappearing to a mountain cabin, Panic at the Disco’s new sound arrives.

Pretty. Odd. revives acclaimed edge found on The Beatles’ Sgt. Pepper, nostalgically launching us back to the beat of our parents’ old record collections. After Panic’s monstrous success with their platinum-selling debut, abandoning their first winning sound seems pretty odd. Coincidence? Probably not. But the band champions over the challenge.

Panic at the Disco recorded the base instrumentals of Pretty. Odd. at the Palms Hotel in their hometown Las Vegas. The strings, on the other hand, were produced by Rob Mathes at the famous Abbey Road Studios in London. The album was also mixed there, which lends to its accurate Beatles vibe.

Perhaps the forfeiture of the exclamation point marks maturation from the overdone, franticly hypersensitive and darkly emotional sound to a more orchestral, effervescent one. The album’s catchy single “Nine in the Afternoon” is infectious, offering trumpet ballads and clever vocals. Frontman Brendon Urie takes a step downstage, handing vocals over to guitarist-songwriter Ryan Ross in songs like “Behind the Sea” and “She Had the World.” The two members’ voices contrast but blend to create an attractive tone that can’t be replicated. “When the Day Met the Night” begins with an ethereal, transcendent flow comparable to the Beatles’ “Within You Without You,” and then opens to big horn lines. One of the most admirable attributions to the album is the ‘stripped-down, acoustic-driven “Northern Downpour,” which romantically blends Urie’s and Ross’s voices. Light and playful string variations and wind instrumentals also help to expand the album. Aside from the strange hoedown in “Folkin’ Around,” (for which the lyrics compensate) all of the tracks on Pretty. Odd. are pretty impressive.

Pretty. Odd. includes its own disclaimer in the opening track “We’re So Starving,” assuring fans, “You don’t have to worry/ ’Cause we’re still the same/ Band.” The album is riskier, more original and hopefully, more Panic at the Disco.

Although it may disappoint fans who anticipated a second shrill, hit-the-dance-floor mix with unnecessarily long song titles, Pretty. Odd. sticks to the Panic at the Disco trend of refurbishing sounds to create something untouched by others. Pretty. Odd. is a refreshing new approach, abandoning artificial electronics and embracing the pure talents needed for real instrumentation and exceptional vocalization. And that deserves enormous applause and respect.

4 1/2 stars out of 5

Feedback

Show all comments

Hide anonymous comments

Anonymous (March 27, 2008 @ 12:20pm):

Wait this written as a joke, or is it serious? I cannot believe anyone who listens to music can actually compare Panic at the Disco to the Beatles. Intentional or not, this would make a good onion article.

Anonymous (March 27, 2008 @ 12:38pm):

Maybe you should listen to the album before you blast the review, dumbass. Pretty. Odd. sounds extremely Beatles-esque, right down to the horn section flourishes and vocal harmonies. It was partially recorded and mixed at Abbey Road for chrissakes, that's about as close as you can get to emulating them. Stop being so close-minded and accept that a band can mature quite a bit in three years. Good review of a good album.

Anonymous (March 27, 2008 @ 3:52pm):

I have listened to it, and it sounds like a cheesy Beatles knockoff. So, yeah it does sound like a poor attempt at emulating the Beatles. It still sucks, sorry, I should have stated that it does indeed sound like the Beatles, although a very poor rendition of them.

Anonymous (March 27, 2008 @ 10:16pm):

This is seriously the best album of the year. Thank you for writing such a great review of it. I am so glad that the band abandoned the weirdness and x-rated-ness of the first album. I hated the first album and I really hope that they continue to develop their new Beatles/Beach Boys sound.... they sound really at home in Pretty. Odd.
.... I hope they stay.

Add a comment

We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.