The Badger Herald

ARTSETC.

Dylan all ‘There’ in new film

Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.

Also by Brett Myers:

Comedian stands up to recent hype (February 26, 2008)
Brother Ali puts up fists (December 10, 2007)
'Alive' sample best of duo (December 6, 2007)
Dylan all 'There' in new film (November 29, 2007)
'Unplugged' DVD uncovers Nirvana (November 27, 2007)

by Brett Myers

Thursday, November 29, 2007

To both our generation and the one that preceded it, Bob Dylan has been one of the nation's most captivating figures. It is this shared aura that director Todd Haynes has captured in the film "I'm Not There." Using a narrative not unlike Dylan's autobiography "Chronicles," "I'm Not There" interweaves seven seemingly unrelated points in his life to create a larger statement about the man we've come to know as Bob Dylan.

Besides the structure of the movie, one of the most interesting aspects of "I'm Not There" is the casting of, among others, a woman (Cate Blanchett, "The Aviator") and a black man (Marcus Carl Franklin, "Law & Order") to portray aspects of Dylan. Todd Haynes' diverse casting choices, along with the fact none of the actors in the movie actually play a character named Bob Dylan (Cate Blanchett's character of Dylan during his transition from folk to rock is named Jude, for example), come together to paint the picture that Bob Dylan is everyone, and everyone is Bob Dylan.

In presenting this metaphor, "I'm Not There" makes many artistic interpretations of events in Dylan's life. For instance, in the scene of Dylan's 1965 performance at the Newport Folk Festival where he shocked the audience by playing electric instead of acoustic, Dylan and his band take the stage and open their instrument cases, and, instead of guitars, they pull out machine guns and spray the audience with bullets. This is a creative way to startle the film audience into feeling what the Newport audience felt Dylan was doing to folk music.

At other times, however, this technique seems trite and trivializing. In the scene of the infamous "Judas" moment at a 1966 concert in Manchester, England, the audience member in question screams "Judas," which causes the rest of the crowd to do the same and subsequently storm the stage, forcing Dylan off. Haynes' unimaginative scene takes what was one of the most pivotal moments in Bob Dylan's career and makes it seem farcical.

But, where the film's interpretations fall flat, "I'm Not There" makes up for it with its fantastic cinematography. Visually, the movie couldn't be better, as it presents the darkness of Dylan's drug-fueled struggle with fame and a vintage cast to Dylan's image in the tail end of the 19th century as Billy the Kid.

Another strength of the film is its superb acting, particularly from the aforementioned actors Cate Blanchett and Marcus Carl Franklin. Blanchett has Dylan's mannerisms down to a fine science, from how he carried himself to how he covered his mouth with his hand. In addition, Franklin's performance makes him seem decades wiser than his young appearance would have you believe.

The greatest failing of "I'm Not There," however, is the overanalyzing of Bob Dylan's life and actions. Just when viewers think they have a hold on the film's takeaway message, it presents something completely new and different and proceeds to chug along. This leaves the viewer so bombarded with conflicting morals for the story that it makes the last 20 minutes of the film drag on and on.

On paper, the idea of seven different actors portraying various parts of Bob Dylan's life seems like a good idea; however, once the idea leaves the page and enters the screen, the idea doesn't seem quite as exquisite. Still, Todd Haynes' "I'm Not There" is a good film despite its shortcomings. Those who know little of Dylan will not be able to understand much of what is presented in the film. Even still, those who do may not even be able to understand everything. In the end, that's exactly the type of man Bob Dylan is — some of him we understand, but a lot him we don't.

3.5 stars out of 5

Add a comment

We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.